David Robinson wrote: > Being a sponsor is not just about typing putback, > but it is actually moderately heavyweight in that > the sponsor is expected to build, test (maybe DIY test?), > and validate the changes. Frankly, in many cases that > may take more time than the actual code change. > > This is definately more than we expect from CRT advocates > for normal RTIs.
exactly, and therein lies much of the problem, IMO...it's all the grunt work with none of the fun of the thrill of the hunt. I understand it needs doing, but...it's certainly what demotivates me, and I'm guessing others.
