I have to execute a separate task, which does not require notifying the client. The original thread needs to return so the client can continue however.
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Savvas Andreas Moysidis < savvas.andreas.moysi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sean, > > I see..if I get this right however, not sure how you can have a pool of > threads that when done return a response to the calling client..don't you > need to somehow keep these connections open? (which would result in the > same client latency as with the AsyncResponse way) > > Perhaps websockets could come in handy here. > > Regards, > Savvas > > On 31 October 2015 at 20:42, Sean Dawson <seandawson2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Thanks for the reply. I'd like the original call to return so the client >> can continue, but initiate processing a tangential action that takes some >> time. >> >> There are other ways to re-architect this better - but we need something >> fairly quick/simple for now. >> >> I'm considering putting in a thread pool watcher/executor for handling >> out-of-band requests. But if the extra thread is guaranteed to complete >> (which it has so far in testing), then that's unneeded currently. >> >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Savvas Andreas Moysidis < >> savvas.andreas.moysi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Sean, >>> >>> If your goal is to process a request in a separate thread other than the >>> handler thread then (assuming you are using a JAX-RS 2.0 implementation) >>> the AsyncResponse API is probably the safest way of achieving that. >>> >>> Have a look at: https://jersey.java.net/documentation/latest/async.html >>> >>> HTH, >>> Savvas >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 29 October 2015 at 21:22, Sean Dawson <seandawson2...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> A general question if anyone here knows off-hand or could point me to >>>> an answer. Perhaps it depends on the http client or server or whatever >>>> but.... >>>> >>>> If I start a new Java thread in server code that handles a RestEasy >>>> call, does that new thread execute fully even if the original call has >>>> ended/returned? Or does it get canceled/interrupted/etc? >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Resteasy-users mailing list >>>> Resteasy-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/resteasy-users >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Resteasy-users mailing list Resteasy-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/resteasy-users
