Christian!

  It is great news! 1.7 sounds better then 2.0 :) Thanks!

Regards,

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Christian Hammond <chip...@chipx86.com> wrote:
> Extensions are going to be the big focus once we get 1.6 out the door. A lot
> of work has gone into it by many, many students through both UCOSP and GSoC,
> so that'll continue :)
>
> Webhooks will end up being an exension. We had some work toward refactoring
> it into an extension recently.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Jan Koprowski <jan.koprow...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>>  I'm surprised You share my point of view. I agree with You that
>> making something new is much more interesting then ending someone's
>> work. Things I can't wait are:
>>  * Kicked as Extensions with many, many, many hooks provided and well
>> documented :D
>>  * Cool webhooks sending also some data (objects) to given URL :P
>>  * Planty of ReviewBoard-Django signals perfectly documented on
>> docs.reviewboard.org :)
>>
>> That is probably all because this allow me to spice ReviewBoard by my
>> own :) for my company :] and waiting for 2.0 since I get it drive me
>> crazy :D
>>
>> Greetings from Poland.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Christian Hammond <chip...@chipx86.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I quite agree. A lot of that needs to be finished up. For some of it,
>> > we've
>> > had students go and finish up the project (or at least get further on
>> > it)
>> > and we'll probably continue to do that.
>> >
>> > There's always, of course, the need to deliver an interesting project
>> > that a
>> > student can work on. Finishing up someone else's work is not nearly as
>> > attractive as doing something new and exciting, so we need to do a bit
>> > of
>> > both, I think.
>> >
>> > Any specific branches you're wanting work done on?
>> >
>> > Christian
>> >
>> > --
>> > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
>> > Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>> > VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Jan Koprowski
>> > <jan.koprow...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >>  Personally I will be glad if GSoC won't provide new features because
>> >> there is too much cool stuff waiting on non-public branches I can't
>> >> wait. IMHO this stuff wait too long and providing it to stable version
>> >> should be the first goal.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >>
>> >> Jan
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Paul Schulz <p...@mawsonlakes.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hi Christian,
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Christian Hammond
>> >> > <chip...@chipx86.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> Hey everyone,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> We've been accepted again this year in Google's Summer of Code, a
>> >> >> yearly
>> >> >> event where students from around the world participate in open
>> >> >> source
>> >> >> projects, developing work experience and getting paid for it.
>> >> >
>> >> > (snip)
>> >> >
>> >> >> We're also looking for ideas for projects, so if you have an idea
>> >> >> for
>> >> >> something awesome you'd like to see, just reply :)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Christian
>> >> >
>> >> > I work as a System Administrator for a large(ish) software
>> >> > engineering
>> >> > organisation and we are making use of and relying on ReviewBoard
>> >> > extensively in our software development process.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thank you for your efforts so far. Working with the Engineers, I more
>> >> > often hear about where the tool falls short, rather then about all
>> >> > the
>> >> > other really good things about ReviewBoard that actually works really
>> >> > well.
>> >> >
>> >> > The this end, I did an internal survey and came up with the following
>> >> > suggestions for feature improvements (see below).
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks again for everyones efforts,
>> >> > Paul
>> >> >
>> >> > ------------------------------------------
>> >> > [Workflow]
>> >> >
>> >> > * Ship-it lockout or reset
>> >> >
>> >> > If the ship-it option has been selected, then no other changes/diffs
>> >> > can be uploaded. Comments can still be made, or if a change to the
>> >> > code is made, then the ship-it tags are removed.
>> >> >
>> >> > * Master Ship-it
>> >> >
>> >> > A reviewer (or group) with master ship-it power is all that is
>> >> > required to designate that a patch be shipped.
>> >> >
>> >> > * Automated Ship-it patch submission
>> >> >
>> >> > If a patch is marked as ship-it, than commit it to the repository.
>> >> > (All of the required information is available, including commit
>> >> > comment.)
>> >> >
>> >> > * Explicitly separate Reviewers from Shippers
>> >> >
>> >> > A shipper is someone with shipping powers, a reviewer is someone who
>> >> > is included in the review for comment.
>> >> >
>> >> > [Integration]
>> >> >
>> >> > * Bugzilla
>> >> >
>> >> > Add a bug report comment to a bug once a review has been completed.
>> >> >
>> >> > * Subversion
>> >> >
>> >> > Block a check in of a patch/changeset until a review has been
>> >> > approved
>> >> > (for some definition of approved).
>> >> >
>> >> > [Improvements]
>> >> >
>> >> > * Allow use of Full Name where usernames are displayed
>> >> >
>> >> > Reviewboard has access to full names, it should make more use of
>> >> > them.
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
>> >> > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> >> > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> >> > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> >> > For more options, visit this group at
>> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> ><> Jan Koprowski
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
>> >> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> >> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> >> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> >> For more options, visit this group at
>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ><> Jan Koprowski
>
>



-- 
><> Jan Koprowski

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Reply via email to