The critical issue is that pysvn does not yet support SVN 1.7, and generates broken results. If someone can find a workaround we're happy to integrate it, but otherwise I think we're going to wait for pysvn to update.
-David On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:19 PM, phoke <paul.w.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > We upgraded to SVN 1.7 when it came out late last year. Unfortunately, > we realized later that ReviewBoard does not have all of the proper > support for SVN 1.7. There are several other people encountering > similar issues/challenges with SVN 1.7 and ReviewBoard compatibility. > The main issue is due to the fact that the diff output that SVN 1.7 > produces contains some new property entries in the diffi file that > ReviewBoard or RB Tools does not seem to understand. > > Related thread: > http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2359 > > Is there any progress being made on SVN 1.7 compatibility support with > ReviewBoard? This issue seems to have been around for several months > now, but I have not seen any messages that indicate any progress or > when a fix might be be available in a new RB release. > > Please let me know if you have any information on this topic. > > Thanks for your help! > Paul > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
