The problem turned out to be the RPM spec file for reviewboard listed 
Djblets 0.6.20, while we upgraded to 0.6.21.
There were auth module errors in the reviewboard log.

This has been fixed by re-rolling the reviewboard RPM.

Thanks for your help.

Phil 

On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 2:00:36 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> We make use of setuptools-provided Python Entrypoints, which register some 
> scannable bits of data for things like authentication modules. It sounds 
> like those registrations got lost somehow in your packaging.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Phil Hom <phil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> We grabed the gzips from the releases directory and created RPMs for 
>> DJblets 0.6.21 and reviewboard 1.6.10,
>> then installed the RPMs, then ran  rb-site upgrade.
>>
>> We used RPMs before for 1.6.3, so continued doing it this way just in 
>> case we need to back out.
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 1:05:27 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>>
>>> Did you upgrade using pip or easy_install?
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Phil Hom <phil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We upgraded from 1.6.3 to 1.6.10, everything looks good.
>>>> Except the Authentication Settings page only shows Standard Reg and 
>>>> Legacy, no LDAP, AD, or others.
>>>>
>>>> Is there something I'm misssing.
>>>> THanks.
>>>>
>>>> Phil
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sunday, July 22, 2012 1:20:30 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> We just released Review Board 1.6.10, which, amongst other things, is 
>>>>> a pretty speedy release.
>>>>>
>>>>> A lot of work went into this release to drastically speed up nearly 
>>>>> every page. There's more to do, but the improvement should be noticeable. 
>>>>> Given the extensive changes that happened under the hood for this, we'd 
>>>>> be 
>>>>> very interested in knowing if you hit any problems.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are some other great little improvements and fixes. See 
>>>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**new**s/2012/07/22/review-board-**1610**
>>>>> -released/<http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/07/22/review-board-1610-released/>for
>>>>>  more information.
>>>>>
>>>>> Christian
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
>>>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>  -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Reply via email to