It's still sitting at the same place and appears to be stuck. I see the rb-site process in ps, but no child processes so I have no idea what it's doing. Sorry I've been more trouble than help in testing this fix.
--steve On Friday, March 1, 2013 1:09:10 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hmm, longer than I'd expect, but it's a fairly big upgrade I suppose, > given how old the DB is. Shame we don't have logging set up to show what > it's doing. Still, no errors in the simulation stage, which is promising. > Hopefully the other issue you hit won't crop up. If it does, we'll need to > investigate further. > > Christian > > On Mar 1, 2013, at 13:03, Steve <seide...@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote: > > I went back to a pristine version of the 1.5.5 database and ran rb-site > again: > > # rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard > Rebuilding directory structure > Updating database. This may take a while. > > The log output below, including warnings and errors, > can be ignored unless upgrade fails. > > ------------------ <begin log output> ------------------ > Creating tables ... > Creating table extensions_registeredextension > Creating table accounts_localsiteprofile > Creating table attachments_fileattachment > Creating table diffviewer_filediffdata > Creating table hostingsvcs_hostingserviceaccount > Creating table reviews_fileattachmentcomment > Creating table site_localsite_users > Creating table site_localsite_admins > Creating table site_localsite > Upgrading Review Board from 1.5.5 to 1.7.6 > There are unapplied evolutions for auth. > There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. > There are unapplied evolutions for changedescs. > There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. > There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. > There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools. > Adding baseline version for new models > Project signature has changed - an evolution is required > Installing custom SQL ... > Installing indexes ... > Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) > Registering new SCM Tool Plastic SCM > (reviewboard.scmtools.plastic.PlasticTool) in database > Evolution could not be simulated, possibly due to raw SQL mutations > ... > > It's been sitting at that point for about 15 minutes. It's a 7GB database, > so it might really be taking this long. Or it might be hung. I'll just > leave it for a while. > > --Steve > > > On Friday, March 1, 2013 12:38:11 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote: >> >> Did you revert to your state before the previous test, or is this on top >> of the previous? It's possible the previous test will have caused a problem >> for this one (though unlikely). >> >> Christian >> >> -- >> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com >> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org >> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com >> >> On Mar 1, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Steve <seide...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Now I get this error: >> >> (1054, "Unknown column 'reviews_reviewrequest.local_site_id' in 'on clause'") >> >> Request Method:GETRequest URL:https://crush/dashboard/Django Version: >> 1.4.5Exception Type:DatabaseErrorException Value: >> >> (1054, "Unknown column 'reviews_reviewrequest.local_site_id' in 'on clause'") >> >> Exception >> Location:/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MySQL_python-1.2.3-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/MySQLdb/connections.py >> >> in defaulterrorhandler, line 36Python Executable:/usr/bin/pythonPython >> Version:2.6.6Python Path: >> >> ['/var/www/reviewboard/conf', >> '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/JCC-2.14-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg', >> '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/lucene-3.6.1-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg', >> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/distribute-0.6.27-py2.6.egg', >> >> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MySQL_python-1.2.3-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg', >> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/recaptcha_client-1.0.6-py2.6.egg', >> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/python_dateutil-1.5-py2.6.egg', >> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/flup-1.0.3.dev_20110405-py2.6.egg', >> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Pygments-1.5-py2.6.egg', >> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/PIL-1.1.7-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg', >> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg', >> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/feedparser-5.1.3-py2.6.egg', >> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.6-py2.6.egg', >> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pytz-2012j-py2.6.egg', >> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/paramiko-1.9.0-py2.6.egg', >> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mimeparse-0.1.3-py2.6.egg', >> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Markdown-2.2.1-py2.6.egg', >> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/docutils-0.10-py2.6.egg', >> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django_pipeline-1.2.24-py2.6.egg', >> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.11-py2.6.egg', >> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg', >> >> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django_evolution-0.6.9alpha0.dev-py2.6.egg', >> '/usr/lib64/python26.zip', >> '/usr/lib64/python2.6', >> '/usr/lib64/python2.6/plat-linux2', >> '/usr/lib64/python2.6/lib-tk', >> '/usr/lib64/python2.6/lib-old', >> '/usr/lib64/python2.6/lib-dynload', >> '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages', >> '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/gst-0.10', >> '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/gtk-2.0', >> '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/webkit-1.0', >> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages'] >> >> >> >> Maybe I should try on a fresh database. >> >> --Steve >> >> On Friday, March 1, 2013 11:26:36 AM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote: >>> >>> That's the wrong Django Evolution. Can you try downloading the one from >>> that URL and just passing it directly to easy_install? >>> >>> Christian >>> >>> -- >>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com >>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org >>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com >>> >>> On Mar 1, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Steve <seide...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Sorry for the long, messy output, here's what happened when I tested the >>> fix. This is an attempt to upgrade a 1.5.5 database to 1.7.6. >>> >>> [root@crush]~/ReviewBoard# easy_install -U django_evolution -f >>> http://downloads.reviewboard.org/temp/django-evolution/ >>> Searching for django-evolution >>> Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/django_evolution/ >>> Reading http://code.google.com/p/django-evolution/ >>> Best match: django-evolution 0.6.8 >>> Downloading >>> http://pypi.python.org/packages/2.6/d/django_evolution/django_evolution-0.6.8-py2.6.egg#md5=7527e0ca398639c87b68969ceb1cd2d7 >>> Processing django_evolution-0.6.8-py2.6.egg >>> removing >>> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django_evolution-0.6.8-py2.6.egg' (and >>> everything under it) >>> creating >>> /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django_evolution-0.6.8-py2.6.egg >>> Extracting django_evolution-0.6.8-py2.6.egg to >>> /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages >>> django-evolution 0.6.8 is already the active version in easy-install.pth >>> >>> Installed >>> /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django_evolution-0.6.8-py2.6.egg >>> Processing dependencies for django-evolution >>> Finished processing dependencies for django-evolution >>> Searching for -f >>> Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/-f/ >>> Couldn't find index page for '-f' (maybe misspelled?) >>> Scanning index of all packages (this may take a while) >>> Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/ >>> C-c C-c^Cinterrupted >>> >>> I don't know why easy_install got confused by '-f', but I did get a new >>> django_evolution, so I tried updating my broken site: >>> >>> [root@crush]~/ReviewBoard# cat rb-upgrade.log >>> Error: Model 'reviews.FileAttachmentComment' already has a field named >>> 'extra_data' >>> Rebuilding directory structure >>> Updating database. This may take a while. >>> >>> The log output below, including warnings and errors, >>> can be ignored unless upgrade fails. >>> >>> ------------------ <begin log output> ------------------ >>> Creating tables ... >>> There are unapplied evolutions for auth. >>> There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. >>> There are unapplied evolutions for changedescs. >>> There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. >>> There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. >>> There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools. >>> Project signature has changed - an evolution is required >>> Installing custom SQL ... >>> Installing indexes ... >>> Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) >>> >>> Now when I log in to my site, I get this: >>> >>> (1054, "Unknown column 'accounts_profile.is_private' in 'field list'") >>> >>> Request Method:GETRequest URL:https://crush/Django Version:1.4.5Exception >>> Type:DatabaseErrorException Value: >>> >>> (1054, "Unknown column 'accounts_profile.is_private' in 'field list'") >>> >>> Exception >>> Location:/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MySQL_python-1.2.3-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/MySQLdb/connections.py >>> >>> in defaulterrorhandler, line 36Python Executable:/usr/bin/pythonPython >>> Version:2.6.6Python Path: >>> >>> ['/var/www/reviewboard/conf', >>> '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/JCC-2.14-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg', >>> '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/lucene-3.6.1-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg', >>> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/distribute-0.6.27-py2.6.egg', >>> >>> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MySQL_python-1.2.3-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg', >>> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/recaptcha_client-1.0.6-py2.6.egg', >>> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/python_dateutil-1.5-py2.6.egg', >>> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/flup-1.0.3.dev_20110405-py2.6.egg', >>> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Pygments-1.5-py2.6.egg', >>> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/PIL-1.1.7-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg', >>> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg', >>> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/feedparser-5.1.3-py2.6.egg', >>> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.6-py2.6.egg', >>> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pytz-2012j-py2.6.egg', >>> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/paramiko-1.9.0-py2.6.egg', >>> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mimeparse-0.1.3-py2.6.egg', >>> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Markdown-2.2.1-py2.6.egg', >>> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/docutils-0.10-py2.6.egg', >>> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django_pipeline-1.2.24-py2.6.egg', >>> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.11-py2.6.egg', >>> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.6.egg', >>> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django_evolution-0.6.8-py2.6.egg', >>> '/usr/lib64/python26.zip', >>> '/usr/lib64/python2.6', >>> '/usr/lib64/python2.6/plat-linux2', >>> '/usr/lib64/python2.6/lib-tk', >>> '/usr/lib64/python2.6/lib-old', >>> '/usr/lib64/python2.6/lib-dynload', >>> '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages', >>> '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/gst-0.10', >>> '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/gtk-2.0', >>> '/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/webkit-1.0', >>> '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages'] >>> >>> Server time:Fri, 1 Mar 2013 19:08:48 +0000 >>> >>> >>> I may try it again on a pristine 1.5.5 database. >>> >>> --Steve >>> >>> On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:16:03 AM UTC-8, Christian Hammond >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> So some of you have hit database upgrade issues before when upgrading >>>> to 1.7 (or, in some cases, 1.6). We've managed to figure out solutions for >>>> some of you, but not all. >>>> >>>> I've spent a lot of time trying to figure out solutions, find the >>>> common cases, and figure out a fix. Today, I have one that should fix it >>>> for at least some of you. What I really need are volunteers to help test >>>> it. >>>> >>>> If you're having issues now, or have had issues in the past and still >>>> have a broken database dump handy, I'd appreciate your help. Heck, even if >>>> you have had no issues, and have an old database dump to test. >>>> >>>> I have a test version of Django Evolution up at >>>> http://downloads.reviewboard.org/temp/django-evolution/ >>>> >>>> This version has some new logic that tries to avoid applying database >>>> upgrades for things that are already in the database, which was the core >>>> problem most of you hit. >>>> >>>> If you can give this a try, here's what I'd like you to do: >>>> >>>> 1) Get an installation going with your broken or pre-upgrade database. >>>> >>>> 2) Install django_evolution from the above URL, using: >>>> >>>> $ sudo easy_install -U django_evolution -f >>>> http://downloads.reviewboard.org/temp/django-evolution/ >>>> >>>> 3) Attempt a Review Board upgrade (rb-site manage /path/to/site upgrade) >>>> >>>> 4) Assuming it works, try to access the site and make sure things >>>> generally work on it. >>>> >>>> >>>> Please then reply to this post with the following information: >>>> >>>> 1) The complete log output. >>>> >>>> 2) Whether you were testing with a dump from before a past broken >>>> upgrade attempt, or a dump made after that past upgrade attempt failed. >>>> >>>> >>>> For extra credit, if you have did have a working database dump, >>>> sanity-checking that you don't have any upgrade problems and that the site >>>> runs would also really help me out. >>>> >>>> Thanks! Sooner I get some feedback, the sooner I can put this problem >>>> to rest. >>>> >>>> - Christian >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com >>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org >>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at >>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ >>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >>> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "reviewboard" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at >> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ >> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "reviewboard" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> >> >> -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "reviewboard" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
