Just had to add http-auth-types=basic to the [global] section of the .subversion/servers file and enable basic auth in addition to the integrated Windows auth on the server.
Our initial confusion was because you can't have a non-AD user in addition to the Windows users, and because I wasn't seeing the VisualSVN UI myself, didn't realize that we were looking at two slightly different things. It would be nice from a security perspective if the kerberos auth worked, but it's not urgent. On Jul 13, 2016 3:02 PM, "Christian Hammond" <christ...@beanbaginc.com> wrote: Hi Cathy, Glad that's been solved! Been working on figuring out the Kerberos stuff, but I haven't gotten as far as I'd like. The way you have it now is probably the ideal way, for performance and maintenance reasons. Would you be able to share what you did to set this up? Thanks, Christian -- Christian Hammond President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Cathy Mullican <cmulli...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, after all that fuss...it turns out that you CAN combine Integrated > Windows Authentication and Basic Windows Authentication with VisualSVN > Server, it's just that the user still has to be in your Active Directory. > (Docs were unclear, and I'm not admin on the SVN server, so there was a > minor grapevine issue, too.) > > So, after some clean-up from my attempt at setting up a dev environment, > it's working. > > On Saturday, July 9, 2016 at 1:47:19 PM UTC-7, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> >> I'm still away from my computer, so I can't give a lot of specifics, so >> here is some general help: >> >> A keytab is basically just a Kerberos principal's password in a file >> format (for all intents and purposes it is plaintext). >> >> Any user can run: >> kinit -k -t /path/to/keytab principal@REALM >> and get a ticket for that principal. >> >> Normally this would be run as the user in the login session for the >> service (ideally the service would use libkrb5 directly instead of the >> kinit CLI). However, you *can* hack around it by setting the env var >> KRB5CCNAME to something like "FILE:/tmp/krv5cc_UID" and then set that same >> env var in the service session. So you could run a cron job to keep the >> ticket in that credential cache updated by running kinit against the keytab. >> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 12:51 PM Cathy Mullican <cmul...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> So here's what I know: >>> Our SVN server is running VisualSVN Enterprise Edition rather than >>> svnserve >>> Integrated Windows Authentication is a feature of that product, and >>> currently, if it's enabled, it's the only authentication method allowed. >>> I've run kinit on the server where I'm trying to install and configure >>> RB, and I can successfully use the command-line svn client. >>> The guy that does subvertpy is quite a few timezones away from me, so >>> conversation is slow going, but here's the exchange: >>> [01 Jul 16 00:43] * jelmer: cmullican: subvertpy does have >>> authentication support >>> [01 Jul 16 00:43] * jelmer: but it needs to be explicitly enabled >>> [01 Jul 16 10:50] * cmullican: Great! How do I do that? I'm finding >>> the documentation a little opaque. >>> [03 Jul 16 05:24] * jelmer: cmullican: see examples/ra_commit.py >>> >>> I didn't find the example terribly enlightening, but was trying to do >>> something based on it to see if I could figure out what was going on. >>> >>> My background is mostly Perl / *nix / SQL, so I'm pretty new to this >>> mixed *nix / Windows / LDAP / krb stuff myself. >>> >>> I also have an email in to VisualSVN to see if they know of any tools >>> that support their authentication, with the secondary hope that they might >>> be inspired to allow a service user to authenticate through a different >>> method even when using Windows auth for everyone else. >>> >>> The config file in /path/to/rbsitedir/data/.subversion/servers is >>> identical to the one in ~/.subversion/servers, which is working. >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Christian Hammond < >>> chri...@beanbaginc.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey Stephen, Cathy, >>>> >>>> Trying to educate myself on this... I'd love to get some >>>> sanity-checking and additional details on how this works. >>>> >>>> I dug through the Subversion and serf source code. It looks like libsvn >>>> handles doing SPNEGO on our behalf, so long as the user has run kinit at >>>> some point. What I don't know (still investigating the code, but it's 4AM >>>> here so I'm done for today) is whether we can use a keytab, or really how >>>> that works (still trying to learn this stuff). >>>> >>>> I *think* libsvn/serf will do the right thing in this case. From what I >>>> read, it should be possible for a keytab to be uploaded to the Review Board >>>> server and, somehow, establish a session that clients can use to request >>>> tickets. I need to figure this out, and would appreciate insights here. >>>> >>>> I think you also need to explicitly tell Subversion to use serf, but >>>> this might be outdated information. If so, you'd want to edit the >>>> Subversion config in /path/to/rbsitedir/data/.subversion/servers to have: >>>> >>>> [global] >>>> http-library = serf >>>> >>>> What I don't know yet is how kinit/keytabs relate to the user. Does >>>> this have to be run within the same login session as the apps needing >>>> tickets? I'm wondering if there's a way to have, say, an Apache crontab >>>> refresh a session periodically, so that svn can continue to get the right >>>> tickets when communicating. >>>> >>>> Christian >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Christian Hammond >>>> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> >>>> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Stephen Gallagher < >>>> ste...@gallagherhome.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I don't have time to work on such a patch directly, but I'd be happy >>>>> to lend my Kerberos experience towards reviewing any such patch. I think >>>>> that would be a very useful feature. >>>>> >>>>> I'd recommend working on full SPNEGO support rather than a >>>>> Kerberos-specific solution. Take a look at the python-gssapi package; it >>>>> should do most of what is needed. >>>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 7:00 PM Christian Hammond < >>>>> chri...@beanbaginc.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Cathy, >>>>>> >>>>>> Would you or someone on your end who has a familiarity with Python >>>>>> and Kerberos be willing to work with us on adding support? Review Board >>>>>> is >>>>>> open source, and I'd be willing to take a patch and assist with any work >>>>>> toward it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Christian >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tuesday, June 28, 2016, Cathy Mullican <cmul...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> It looks like RB isn't using (doesn't support?) kerberos >>>>>>> authentication, and that seems to be necessary for the set up we have. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sadly, this may mean we can't use RB at this time. :( >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Monday, June 27, 2016 at 5:22:17 PM UTC-7, Cathy Mullican wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Since it is working on the command line at this point, my money >>>>>>>> would be on #2 rather than #1. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://serverfault.com/questions/183231/how-to-configure-review-board-running-under-linux-to-use-a-ldap-user >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> is the most relevant-seeming info I've found so far, but enough has >>>>>>>> changed in the 5+ years since it was posted that applying the info >>>>>>>> there is >>>>>>>> not entirely straightforward. (Recreating a .subversion/auth tree is >>>>>>>> relatively straightforward; figuring out the LDAP auth configuration, >>>>>>>> less >>>>>>>> so.) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Monday, June 27, 2016 at 4:44:57 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Okay. So it's probably one of two things: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 1) Something is still messed up somewhere with the recompilation. >>>>>>>>> I don't know what, and can't really debug that from here. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2) The standard way of authenticating that we do doesn't support >>>>>>>>> your setup. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It could easily be #2. We must be able to authenticate to the >>>>>>>>> Subversion server using a username and password (or anonymously). If >>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>> is going through some alternative method for authentication, then it >>>>>>>>> may >>>>>>>>> require additional support in Review Board. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Christian >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Christian Hammond >>>>>>>>> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> >>>>>>>>> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Cathy Mullican <cmul...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The server is VisualSVN (paid edition), with Windows AD >>>>>>>>>> authentication. The server where RB is running is joined to the >>>>>>>>>> domain, >>>>>>>>>> and I can authenticate from the command line. Most users connect via >>>>>>>>>> TortoiseSVN on their Windows systems; I also have one other Ubuntu >>>>>>>>>> box >>>>>>>>>> configured so that i can join the domain, authenticate with kinit, >>>>>>>>>> and run >>>>>>>>>> svn from the command line. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Monday, June 27, 2016 at 3:43:19 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Cathy, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Progress is good! I think I'll need more info on your setup at >>>>>>>>>>> this point though. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Can you tell me more about how authentication works on your >>>>>>>>>>> Subversion setup? From the client's end, is it a standard >>>>>>>>>>> username/password, or is more involved? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What does the server setup look like? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The error message shown there ("Error running context: An error >>>>>>>>>>> occurred during authentication") is coming from Subversion itself. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Christian >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Christian Hammond >>>>>>>>>>> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> >>>>>>>>>>> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Cathy Mullican < >>>>>>>>>>> cmul...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> OK, it definitely works better when you don't accidentally skip >>>>>>>>>>>> a step! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I can now successfully do svn info from the command line, but I >>>>>>>>>>>> still can't create the repo in RB. The error message in the log is >>>>>>>>>>>> now: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-06-27 17:00:00,253 - ERROR - - SVN: Failed to get >>>>>>>>>>>> repository information for https://az-fs1.revshare.int/svn/rad: >>>>>>>>>>>> Unable to connect to a repository at URL ' >>>>>>>>>>>> https://az-fs1.revshare.int/svn/rad' >>>>>>>>>>>> Error running context: An error occurred during authentication >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No more ra_serf error, so that's progress, at least! But also >>>>>>>>>>>> nothing very informative, at least to my eye. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, June 27, 2016 at 9:45:50 AM UTC-7, Cathy Mullican >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I did >>>>>>>>>>>>> apt-get source python-svn >>>>>>>>>>>>> then started trying to follow the directions in INSTALL.html, >>>>>>>>>>>>> but they didn't work at all...although lookin gback now, some of >>>>>>>>>>>>> that may >>>>>>>>>>>>> have been because it was Friday afternoon and I missed something; >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm >>>>>>>>>>>>> trying again now. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 5:44:51 PM UTC-7, Christian >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hammond wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Cathy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How are you trying to build from source? It is a bit of a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pain to do from the upstream source, but perhaps you can rebuild >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the deb. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christian >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christian Hammond >>>>>>>>>>>>>> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Cathy Mullican < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cmul...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The stock libserf in Ubuntu 14.04 lacks GSSAPI support, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is why I have to build that from source. ( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/serf/+bug/1303167 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- why they never released a fixed version, when the patch is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the ticket, I can't say.) Everything except libserf is stock. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trying to reinstall pysvn with apt tells me it's already up >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to date; trying to build from source is...not working well, but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably going off into the weeds. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 4:06:12 PM UTC-7, Christian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hammond wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Cathy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This might be an incompatibility between libsvn and pysvn. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You may need to now recompile pysvn and replace the copies on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filesystem. That or go back to purely system libs for svn, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> libsvn, pysvn, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serf, etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christian Hammond >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Cathy Mullican < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cmul...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Same error with the repository root path -- I actually >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> started with that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I enabled logging, and now have this error message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-06-24 20:29:24,091 - ERROR - - SVN: Failed to get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository information for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://az-fs1.revshare.int/svn/rad: ra_serf was compiled >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for serf 1.3.8 but loaded an incompatible >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 32676.1946284232.32676 library >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which I thought told me what I needed; Ubuntu 14.0.4 ships >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with serf 1.3.3 -- but I've upgraded to 1.3.8 (built from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source, confirmed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GSSAPI support included), and I'm still getting the same >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can successfully run svn info on the commend line; the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu box is joined to the AD domain. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 1:04:19 PM UTC-7, Christian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hammond wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Cathy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You may need to enable logging in Admin UI -> Logging >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Settings. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the SVN repository path, you'll need to point it to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the root of the SVN repository, rather than a subdirectory >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> within it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basically, the "Repository Root" value from "svn info". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See if that fixes it. If not, I'll help with some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> additional commands you can try on the server to better >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> diagnose this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One last thing: Make sure to enter your credentials in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Username/Password fields again once you've hit an error >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like this. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> browser has a nasty tendency to overwrite the values you've >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provided with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what's in the password manager. We've worked around this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> several times in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the past, but some browsers (ahem, Chrome) have been working >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tirelessly to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> override what webapp developers want in this regard. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christian Hammond >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Cathy Mullican < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cmul...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-HPUcudJKt-Y/V22OjqvsWXI/AAAAAAAABKg/6upZE0bJH6QZYheLe24Ub-JCdaUM5gCDwCLcB/s1600/rb_error.PNG> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's not much to show -- see the attached screenshot. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is the correct URL, as shown by svn info, and googling >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tells me that's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the message I'd see with an authentication error. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are no files in /var/www/rb.revshare.int/logs/ ; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is there another location I should be checking? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've used RB before, but this is the first time I've set >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it up. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-HPUcudJKt-Y/V22OjqvsWXI/AAAAAAAABKg/6upZE0bJH6QZYheLe24Ub-JCdaUM5gCDwCLcB/s1600/rb_error.PNG> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 1:23:24 AM UTC-7, Christian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hammond wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Cathy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you show me what errors you're seeing, along with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the configuration set for the repository? Also, is there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Review Board log files? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christian Hammond >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Cathy Mullican < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cmul...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have RB 2.5.6.1 set up and working on Ubuntu 14.04, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with AD authentication -- I can log in to RB as admin or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as my domain user. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now I'm trying to add a repo. Our SVN repo runs under >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VisualSVN (Pro), with AD authentication. I can set up >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the server to join >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the group, and run svn info from the command line >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully, but I get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> errors trying to create the repo. Not really sure where >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to go with it from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here; any suggestions? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Happy user? Let us know! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emails from it, send an email to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Happy user? Let us know! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >>>>>>>>>>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://rbcommons.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "reviewboard" group. >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Christian Hammond >>>>>> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> >>>>>> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: >>>>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >>>>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: >>>>>> https://rbcommons.com/ >>>>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >>>>>> --- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "reviewboard" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: >>>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >>>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: >>>>> https://rbcommons.com/ >>>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >>>>> --- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "reviewboard" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: >>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: >>> https://rbcommons.com/ >>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "reviewboard" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
