This bug is fixed in 2.0.21. -David
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 8:55 AM Philip Sanders <sanders.phi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think I just hit this issue with the same release too. Is there any way > to get out of this situation other than creating an entire new review? > > > On Friday, July 3, 2015 at 3:54:30 PM UTC-5, David Trowbridge wrote: > > Dan, > > This is something that used to work correctly, but obviously something has > regressed. I'd actually run into this just a couple days ago, so I'll take > a look soon. > > -David > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:01 AM, Daniel Laird <daniel....@googlemail.com> > wrote: > > WE are running 2.0.17 and have managed to create a situation and dont know > how to resolve it - or whether its a defect > > Someone created 2 reviews with code changes that were dependent. > They marked Review 2 as Depends On Review 1 - this then updated the > 'Blocks' field. > They then marked Review 1 as Depends On Review 2 - as they felt that both > reviews had to be committed together. > > However the server then starts to give us lots of errors: > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File > "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.11-py2.7.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py", > line 199, in get_response > response = middleware_method(request, response) > > File > "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.11-py2.7.egg/django/middleware/http.py", > line 14, in process_response > response['Content-Length'] = str(len(response.content)) > > File > "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.8.20-py2.7.egg/djblets/webapi/responses.py", > line 109, in _get_content > **self.encoder_kwargs) > > File > "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.8.20-py2.7.egg/djblets/webapi/encoders.py", > line 110, in encode > return super(JSONEncoderAdapter, self).encode(o) > > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/json/encoder.py", line 201, in encode > chunks = self.iterencode(o, _one_shot=True) > > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/json/encoder.py", line 264, in iterencode > return _iterencode(o, 0) > > ValueError: Circular reference detected > > It maybe that the double linking is incorrect usage - however having been > able to get into that situation. If we try to remove one of the 'Blocks' > fields we just get a spinning 'Loading' icon and are unable to move past > this to remove the Circular Reference. > > Not sure if you think this is user error, a defect or a combination of > both - but thought I would share it. > > Cheers > Dan > > -- > Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: > https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ > Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: > https://rbcommons.com/ > Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "reviewboard" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. > > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: > https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ > Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: > https://rbcommons.com/ > Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "reviewboard" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
