> On April 8, 2016, 3:04 p.m., Sumit Mohanty wrote:
> > ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/upgrade/UpgradeCatalog222.java,
> >  line 186
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/45930/diff/1/?file=1337196#file1337196line186>
> >
> >     Should we initialize if Storm/Kafka are not deployed? What happens when 
> > Add Service is called later.
> 
> Dmytro Sen wrote:
>     I handle it inside initializeStromAnsKafkaWidgets()
>     
>     if ("STORM".equals(service.getName()) || 
> "KAFKA".equals(service.getName())) {
>                   controller.initializeWidgetsAndLayouts(cluster, service);
>     }
> 
> Dmytro Sen wrote:
>     and only for deployed services
>     
>     Map<String, Service> serviceMap = cluster.getServices();

Ha! not sure how I missed that.


- Sumit


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45930/#review127802
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 8, 2016, 3:04 p.m., Dmytro Sen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/45930/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 8, 2016, 3:04 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Andrew Onischuk, Myroslav Papirkovskyy, and 
> Vitalyi Brodetskyi.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-15759
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-15759
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> 1. Running Ambari 2.2.1.0
> 2. Upgraded to Amabri 2.2.1.1
> 3. Storm widgets are not showing on Services > Storm > Summary
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/upgrade/UpgradeCatalog222.java
>  77b8b45 
>   
> ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/upgrade/UpgradeCatalog222Test.java
>  5f07e56 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45930/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Unit tests passed
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dmytro Sen
> 
>

Reply via email to