----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46949/#review131580 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! ambari-common/src/main/python/resource_management/libraries/functions/namenode_ha_utils.py (line 141) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46949/#comment195595> Is there a possibility where active_namenodes can be an empty list? - A case where both namenodes are down? ambari-common/src/main/python/resource_management/libraries/functions/namenode_ha_utils.py (line 143) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46949/#comment195597> Do you need to log this explicitly using Logger.fail() or does it get logged automatically to std-err log, which shows up the UI? - Matt On May 3, 2016, 4:05 p.m., jun aoki wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/46949/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated May 3, 2016, 4:05 p.m.) > > > Review request for Ambari. > > > Bugs: AMBARI-16237 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-16237 > > > Repository: ambari > > > Description > ------- > > PXF alerts shows "Configuration parameter 'fs_root' was not found in > configurations dictionary!" when both namnodes are down on secured NN HA > environment, which the error message is not too clear. > > > Diffs > ----- > > > ambari-common/src/main/python/resource_management/libraries/functions/namenode_ha_utils.py > ee16c9b > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46949/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Manually tested. > > > Thanks, > > jun aoki > >
