-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46949/#review131580
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!





ambari-common/src/main/python/resource_management/libraries/functions/namenode_ha_utils.py
 (line 141)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/46949/#comment195595>

    Is there a possibility where active_namenodes can be an empty list? - A 
case where both namenodes are down?



ambari-common/src/main/python/resource_management/libraries/functions/namenode_ha_utils.py
 (line 143)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/46949/#comment195597>

    Do you need to log this explicitly using Logger.fail() or does it get 
logged automatically to std-err log, which shows up the UI?


- Matt


On May 3, 2016, 4:05 p.m., jun aoki wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/46949/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 3, 2016, 4:05 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-16237
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-16237
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> PXF alerts shows "Configuration parameter 'fs_root' was not found in 
> configurations dictionary!" when both namnodes are down on secured NN HA 
> environment, which the error message is not too clear.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-common/src/main/python/resource_management/libraries/functions/namenode_ha_utils.py
>  ee16c9b 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46949/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manually tested.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jun aoki
> 
>

Reply via email to