> On Sept. 9, 2016, 9:16 p.m., Alejandro Fernandez wrote:
> > ambari-web/app/controllers/wizard/step4_controller.js, line 37
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/51744/diff/1/?file=1494647#file1494647line37>
> >
> >     -1 Why are we requiring HDP stacks to forcibly install SmartSense?
> >     This feels like a hidden tactic. Any user that wants to install 
> > SmartSense will add it, just as they do other components; plus, there's 
> > already a dialog box warning if the user doesn't select it.
> >     
> >     Devs, Sandbox, etc., don't need it.

UI shouldn't have knowledge about SmartSense. Instead, consider moving this to 
a stack config that is specific to this service.


- Alejandro


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51744/#review148373
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 8, 2016, 8:09 p.m., Vivek Ratnavel Subramanian wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51744/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 8, 2016, 8:09 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Jaimin Jetly, Zhe (Joe) Wang, and Yusaku Sako.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-18346
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-18346
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Perform a UI hack to force selection of SmartSense for HDP stacks (the user 
> cannot deselect).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ambari-web/app/controllers/wizard/step4_controller.js 04e6784 
>   ambari-web/app/mappers/stack_service_mapper.js c800e83 
>   ambari-web/app/models/stack_service.js 9cf9d49 
>   ambari-web/app/templates/wizard/step4.hbs c62d369 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51744/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Verified manually.
> Ambari-web unit test pass.
> 29244 tests complete (26 seconds)
> 154 tests pending
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vivek Ratnavel Subramanian
> 
>

Reply via email to