-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51813/#review148533
-----------------------------------------------------------




ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/AMBARI_METRICS/0.1.0/package/scripts/service_check.py
 (line 42)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/51813/#comment215979>

    Aggree that 30 is too high but 5 is too low, how about 10 ?



ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/AMBARI_METRICS/0.1.0/package/scripts/service_check.py
 (line 45)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/51813/#comment215977>

    I think this should be 10 secs linke server sice default. Rest of the 
settings make sense.



ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/AMBARI_METRICS/0.1.0/package/scripts/service_check.py
 (line 76)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/51813/#comment215984>

    Can we do this in parallel?



ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/AMBARI_METRICS/0.1.0/package/scripts/service_check.py
 (line 153)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/51813/#comment215980>

    We should log the same output as the exception since plain old message 
would not be meaningful in the log.


- Sid Wagle


On Sept. 12, 2016, 3:59 p.m., Dmytro Sen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51813/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 12, 2016, 3:59 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Aravindan Vijayan and Sid Wagle.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-17457
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-17457
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Fix service check to andle AMS HA
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/AMBARI_METRICS/0.1.0/package/scripts/service_check.py
>  ddd3e42 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51813/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Unit tests passed
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dmytro Sen
> 
>

Reply via email to