-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/57563/#review170891
-----------------------------------------------------------




ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/BlueprintConfigurationProcessor.java
Lines 936 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/57563/#comment243753>

    This should not be set by the BP processor.  
    
    Maybe what you want to do is if `krb5-conf/manage_krb5_conf` is `true`, 
then fail if `kerberos-env/kcd_hosts` is empty. I am not sure if this check is 
possible.


- Robert Levas


On April 3, 2017, 12:42 p.m., Amruta Borkar wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/57563/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 3, 2017, 12:42 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Di Li and Robert Levas.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-20386
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-20386
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Blueprint validation does not prompt if kdc_hosts is not specified in the 
> blueprint. After service installation, deployment fails during Create 
> Principal stage. As /etc/krb5.conf is overwritten with blank values.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/BlueprintConfigurationProcessor.java
>  db1aa074d4 
>   
> ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/api/query/render/ClusterBlueprintRendererTest.java
>  13db5f8b56 
>   
> ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/BlueprintConfigurationProcessorTest.java
>  dba40437ae 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/57563/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manual testing done, if no kdc_hosts is mentioned then validation exception 
> will be thrown during blueprint registration.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Amruta Borkar
> 
>

Reply via email to