-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34121/#review83481
-----------------------------------------------------------


What's the motivation here?  Seems like attempted state transitions for unknown 
tasks should be transient and/or represent a bug.  In those cases, i would 
assume we definitely want logging.  Is there somthing i'm overlooking?


src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/state/TaskStateMachine.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/34121/#comment134492>

    This is pretty weird behavior - 'no logging unless you ask really nicely'.
    
    Rather than the enableLogging flag, how about we let the caller pass a 
Logger, and for the finest-only logging, we have a logger that has its level 
set appropriately?


- Bill Farner


On May 12, 2015, 8:40 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/34121/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 12, 2015, 8:40 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora and Bill Farner.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Quieting down state transition logging in preparation for task state 
> reconciliation.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/state/StateManagerImpl.java 
> 2a943cf51d0a41260ada6965cea5f55db4c3f846 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/state/TaskStateMachine.java 
> 4a7ca6267ae6c4c062f941c78a4a3496d110e8c2 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/state/StateManagerImplTest.java 
> afb7db8eefa63b84d370877742870acdec58899c 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/state/TaskStateMachineTest.java 
> b30a0737bb0d60cd8b58f7be0fff5db20f808347 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34121/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> ./gradlew -Pq build
> ./src/test/sh/org/apache/aurora/e2e/test_end_to_end.sh
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Maxim Khutornenko
> 
>

Reply via email to