> On July 22, 2015, 7:56 p.m., Kevin Sweeney wrote:
> > build-support/packaging/debian/rules, line 37
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/36700/diff/1/?file=1018921#file1018921line37>
> >
> >     Can you delete the code these targets reference as well, as presumably 
> > there are now source files without BUILD file owners in our tree

Done.


- Bill


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36700/#review92639
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 22, 2015, 6:50 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/36700/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 22, 2015, 6:50 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney and Brian Wickman.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-1381
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1381
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The meaning of the targets under 
> `src/main/python/apache/thermos/cli/bin/BUILD` and 
> `src/main/python/apache/thermos/observer/bin/BUILD` changed recently, which 
> bit several people (including our own packaging).  This removes targets that 
> Aurora users should not be consuming.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   build-support/packaging/debian/rules 
> 23828c02b73f007393d2ed4ce69c010cebf07e57 
>   build-support/packaging/rpm/aurora.spec 
> 0c4c106a1730ee7e4e62c7ba778e7f0e2cb44771 
>   src/main/python/apache/thermos/BUILD 
> 8221aa0bd4efe5f519550cba716d6a564ba9ae44 
>   src/main/python/apache/thermos/cli/bin/BUILD 
> f33c7f838a6a0932abc737d0ecf7ca3a59580e2e 
>   src/main/python/apache/thermos/observer/BUILD 
> 41db2cc2e11234c434f58f55abec0b9f308096be 
>   src/main/python/apache/thermos/observer/bin/BUILD 
> 0abe2ccfe9c5ccb509ad731125385900114ba352 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36700/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>

Reply via email to