> On Sept. 15, 2015, 8:59 p.m., Stephan Erb wrote: > > docs/configuration-reference.md, line 346 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/38390/diff/2/?file=1073338#file1073338line346> > > > > How about attaching a date or version classifier here? Makes it much > > easier for a reader to understand if this is a valid concern or if the docu > > is just out of date (unfortunately that is rather common in many projects).
I'd avoid sprinkling a version over our docs to avoid additional maintenance burden. I.e. a version pointer can get stale very quickly when our release plans change. - Maxim ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38390/#review99091 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Sept. 15, 2015, 12:54 a.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/38390/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 15, 2015, 12:54 a.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora and Bill Farner. > > > Bugs: AURORA-1441 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1441 > > > Repository: aurora > > > Description > ------- > > Adding oversubscription summary. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/configuration-reference.md ad2701cadd38bb2fdbbe2acc477038986f8ec733 > docs/deploying-aurora-scheduler.md 8db0e615b6abe6865a889dbcfb24271655caaee6 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38390/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Private remote: > https://github.com/maxim111333/incubator-aurora/blob/oversubscription_docs/docs/ > > > Thanks, > > Maxim Khutornenko > >
