> On Dec. 15, 2015, 11:46 a.m., Zameer Manji wrote:
> > src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/HttpStatsFilter.java, line 57
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/41392/diff/3/?file=1164532#file1164532line57>
> >
> >     Drive by post-commit comment. Can we not supress deprecation without a 
> > comment explaining what it is supressing?

In this case, that sounds highly redundant.  We are implementing an interface 
that contains a deprecated method, and forwarding to the wrapped instance thus 
calling its deprecated method.  This results in a compiler warning.  I 
generally agree with annotating suppressions, but not in this case.


> On Dec. 15, 2015, 11:46 a.m., Zameer Manji wrote:
> > src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/JettyServerModule.java, line 
> > 395
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/41392/diff/3/?file=1164533#file1164533line395>
> >
> >     The addition of Slf4J here further complicates our logging story. Plus, 
> > I'm not aware of us bundling any slf4j backends with our build so I am 
> > pretty sure these request messages are now lost.
> >     
> >     Bill, can you confirm/deny these messages are kept and if so, what is 
> > is the slf4j backend that is used?

Not sure what you mean.  We already rely on slf4j slf4j-jdk14.  

I was able to quickly verify via `./gradlew run` that logging works:
```
I1215 20:32:46.734 THREAD137 org.eclipse.jetty.server.Slf4jRequestLog.write: 
0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1 - - [15/Dec/2015:20:32:46 +0000] "GET 
//localhost:8081/assets/index.html HTTP/1.1" 200 568
```


- Bill


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41392/#review110552
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 14, 2015, 10:39 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/41392/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 14, 2015, 10:39 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora and Maxim Khutornenko.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Jetty 7 and 8 are are at EOL and in maintenace mode.  This brings us up to 
> the latest.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   build.gradle ab1ec1ccebc3366db9531d6518507c7e7a5a6e64 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/HttpStatsFilter.java 
> 7ffd10573b31089c850802854b344433d64ed08b 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/JettyServerModule.java 
> c78315da4b7a23fac274e10e2c8bcb4001a0d94c 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/RequestLogger.java 
> ef6a84879a2a90d2c7ff2a81a723b20c56d550c2 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/api/ApiModule.java 
> 791fd45646f4b353122e723b43b22b44baf5279b 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/RequestLoggerTest.java 
> a2f786a588633e82890c2e8d695a5be2fde45452 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/ServletFilterTest.java 
> 3a18e94e3459b020f86a4f50e4f7e745ed33e670 
>   src/test/sh/org/apache/aurora/e2e/test_kerberos_end_to_end.sh 
> 82ff8682d9b22236f3488cd7c107e2bba87c1e23 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41392/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>

Reply via email to