> On Sept. 2, 2016, 9:09 p.m., Zameer Manji wrote:
> > LGTM.
> > 
> > Should we link to the `latest` version of the Mesos docs or just the latest 
> > version we support at time of writing?

I'd favor if we stick to `latest` due to the decresed maintenane effort for us.


- Stephan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51602/#review147686
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 2, 2016, 4:55 p.m., Stephan Erb wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51602/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 2, 2016, 4:55 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornenko and Zameer Manji.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> I had to answer a couple of questions regarding these over the recent weeks 
> and thought it might make sense to update the docs accordingly.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/features/multitenancy.md cb45beb213eb74296194f8cad9e1aefbde07af02 
>   docs/features/resource-isolation.md 
> 59da8231a3e25e64b4be8c30a44c1043188aff2c 
>   docs/operations/configuration.md 350ea77e30ce445ba9e37ea95a9e4f593dbbe402 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51602/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Rendered version available at 
> https://github.com/StephanErb/aurora/tree/isolation-docs
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stephan Erb
> 
>

Reply via email to