> On Sept. 2, 2016, 9:09 p.m., Zameer Manji wrote: > > LGTM. > > > > Should we link to the `latest` version of the Mesos docs or just the latest > > version we support at time of writing?
I'd favor if we stick to `latest` due to the decresed maintenane effort for us. - Stephan ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51602/#review147686 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Sept. 2, 2016, 4:55 p.m., Stephan Erb wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/51602/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 2, 2016, 4:55 p.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora, Maxim Khutornenko and Zameer Manji. > > > Repository: aurora > > > Description > ------- > > I had to answer a couple of questions regarding these over the recent weeks > and thought it might make sense to update the docs accordingly. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/features/multitenancy.md cb45beb213eb74296194f8cad9e1aefbde07af02 > docs/features/resource-isolation.md > 59da8231a3e25e64b4be8c30a44c1043188aff2c > docs/operations/configuration.md 350ea77e30ce445ba9e37ea95a9e4f593dbbe402 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51602/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Rendered version available at > https://github.com/StephanErb/aurora/tree/isolation-docs > > > Thanks, > > Stephan Erb > >