> On Oct. 4, 2016, 3:25 p.m., Dmitriy Shirchenko wrote:
> > build-support/python/make-mesos-native-egg, line 78
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/52531/diff/1/?file=1522406#file1522406line78>
> >
> >     Any reason why you aren't using debian/jessie [1] vagrant image name as 
> > a label and using bento/debian-8.2 instead?
> >     
> >     [1] 
> > https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/blob/master/builder/deb/debian-jessie/Dockerfile#L13

Unfortunately, debian/jessie doesn't come with guest additions installed so 
/vagrant is not mounted in the VM (which we rely on to transfer the eggs from 
the VM to the host). An alternative solution to using the bento image is to 
install the additions ourselves and to configure the box to mount /vagrant 
correctly in the VM. This seems a bit brittle to me but I'm neutral on it. More 
info on this here: https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant/issues/7157


- Renan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/52531/#review151414
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 4, 2016, 3:16 p.m., Renan DelValle wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/52531/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 4, 2016, 3:16 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Support for making mesos native python eggs for Debian Jessie and Ubuntu 
> Xenial.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   build-support/python/make-mesos-native-egg 
> 93874964b6e25ab419ca04c0fae674c3c2ce5e15 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52531/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> ./make-mesos-native-egg jessie64 1.0.0 $(pwd)/test
> ./make-mesos-native-egg xenial64 1.0.0 $(pwd)/test
> 
> *NOTE: Have not tried installing the python eggs generated.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Renan DelValle
> 
>

Reply via email to