----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52669/#review159028 -----------------------------------------------------------
Just a quick note: I enabled this to faciliate something else I'm working on, and I discovered that the `/h2console` endpoint doesn't seem to work with these changes applied. That endpoint is not well documented, but it's still important to have available. We probably need to do some work to get it working reliably in vagrant (i.e. no hacks to disable security) and then add some e2e tests around it. - Joshua Cohen On Oct. 11, 2016, 6:17 p.m., Stephan Erb wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/52669/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 11, 2016, 6:17 p.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora, David McLaughlin, John Sirois, and Zameer Manji. > > > Repository: aurora > > > Description > ------- > > This experiment is inspired by David's comment: "I don’t think the > storage engine matters. We just need to be able to offload it from > the Scheduler JVM. The problem with H2 isn’t SQL or anything else, > it’s the GC pressure." > > Basic idea is to switch to another storage backend: "nioMemFS stores > data outside of the VM's heap - useful for large memory DBs without > incurring GC costs" (http://www.h2database.com/html/advanced.html) > > Our micro-benchmarks look promising > > Current Master (on-heap db with latest versions): > > TaskStoreBenchmarks.DBFetchTasksBenchmark.run N/A > N/A N/A 10000 thrpt 5 72851.249 ± 15794.210 ops/s > TaskStoreBenchmarks.DBFetchTasksBenchmark.run N/A > N/A N/A 50000 thrpt 5 31626.929 ± 17326.988 ops/s > TaskStoreBenchmarks.DBFetchTasksBenchmark.run N/A > N/A N/A 100000 thrpt 5 0.078 ± 0.013 ops/s > TaskStoreBenchmarks.MemFetchTasksBenchmark.run N/A > N/A N/A 10000 thrpt 5 414.135 ± 315.838 ops/s > TaskStoreBenchmarks.MemFetchTasksBenchmark.run N/A > N/A N/A 50000 thrpt 5 68.643 ± 24.303 ops/s > TaskStoreBenchmarks.MemFetchTasksBenchmark.run N/A > N/A N/A 100000 thrpt 5 32.032 ± 13.870 ops/s > UpdateStoreBenchmarks.JobDetailsBenchmark.run N/A > 1000 N/A N/A thrpt 5 143.981 ± 78.985 ops/s > UpdateStoreBenchmarks.JobDetailsBenchmark.run N/A > 5000 N/A N/A thrpt 5 35.224 ± 25.593 ops/s > UpdateStoreBenchmarks.JobDetailsBenchmark.run N/A > 10000 N/A N/A thrpt 5 18.869 ± 3.318 ops/s > UpdateStoreBenchmarks.JobInstructionsBenchmark.run 1 > N/A N/A N/A thrpt 5 36.013 ± 19.743 ops/s > UpdateStoreBenchmarks.JobInstructionsBenchmark.run 10 > N/A N/A N/A thrpt 5 33.813 ± 11.216 ops/s > UpdateStoreBenchmarks.JobInstructionsBenchmark.run 100 > N/A N/A N/A thrpt 5 20.516 ± 10.526 ops/s > UpdateStoreBenchmarks.JobInstructionsBenchmark.run 1000 > N/A N/A N/A thrpt 5 16.564 ± 2.993 ops/s > UpdateStoreBenchmarks.JobUpdateMetadataBenchmark.run N/A > N/A 10 N/A thrpt 5 32.399 ± 21.310 ops/s > UpdateStoreBenchmarks.JobUpdateMetadataBenchmark.run N/A > N/A 100 N/A thrpt 5 35.518 ± 7.468 ops/s > UpdateStoreBenchmarks.JobUpdateMetadataBenchmark.run N/A > N/A 1000 N/A thrpt 5 19.757 ± 10.035 ops/s > UpdateStoreBenchmarks.JobUpdateMetadataBenchmark.run N/A > N/A 10000 N/A thrpt 5 10.849 ± 10.660 ops/s > > This patch (off-heap db): > > Benchmark (instanceOverrides) > (instances) (metadata) (numTasks) Mode Cnt Score Error Units > TaskStoreBenchmarks.DBFetchTasksBenchmark.run N/A > N/A N/A 10000 thrpt 5 77746.436 ± 47191.240 ops/s > TaskStoreBenchmarks.DBFetchTasksBenchmark.run N/A > N/A N/A 50000 thrpt 5 70099.087 ± 37223.642 ops/s > TaskStoreBenchmarks.DBFetchTasksBenchmark.run N/A > N/A N/A 100000 thrpt 5 30461.428 ± 22964.261 ops/s > TaskStoreBenchmarks.MemFetchTasksBenchmark.run N/A > N/A N/A 10000 thrpt 5 335.302 ± 229.328 ops/s > TaskStoreBenchmarks.MemFetchTasksBenchmark.run N/A > N/A N/A 50000 thrpt 5 61.443 ± 24.280 ops/s > TaskStoreBenchmarks.MemFetchTasksBenchmark.run N/A > N/A N/A 100000 thrpt 5 32.129 ± 13.067 ops/s > UpdateStoreBenchmarks.JobDetailsBenchmark.run N/A > 1000 N/A N/A thrpt 5 411.866 ± 396.308 ops/s > UpdateStoreBenchmarks.JobDetailsBenchmark.run N/A > 5000 N/A N/A thrpt 5 92.208 ± 65.238 ops/s > UpdateStoreBenchmarks.JobDetailsBenchmark.run N/A > 10000 N/A N/A thrpt 5 49.870 ± 44.519 ops/s > UpdateStoreBenchmarks.JobInstructionsBenchmark.run 1 > N/A N/A N/A thrpt 5 90.074 ± 31.360 ops/s > UpdateStoreBenchmarks.JobInstructionsBenchmark.run 10 > N/A N/A N/A thrpt 5 114.224 ± 48.576 ops/s > UpdateStoreBenchmarks.JobInstructionsBenchmark.run 100 > N/A N/A N/A thrpt 5 108.767 ± 25.154 ops/s > UpdateStoreBenchmarks.JobInstructionsBenchmark.run 1000 > N/A N/A N/A thrpt 5 45.995 ± 14.795 ops/s > UpdateStoreBenchmarks.JobUpdateMetadataBenchmark.run N/A > N/A 10 N/A thrpt 5 72.343 ± 77.696 ops/s > UpdateStoreBenchmarks.JobUpdateMetadataBenchmark.run N/A > N/A 100 N/A thrpt 5 84.984 ± 27.971 ops/s > UpdateStoreBenchmarks.JobUpdateMetadataBenchmark.run N/A > N/A 1000 N/A thrpt 5 89.819 ± 44.923 ops/s > UpdateStoreBenchmarks.JobUpdateMetadataBenchmark.run N/A > N/A 10000 N/A thrpt 5 31.670 ± 15.236 ops/s > > > Please be aware: The values seen here will not really carry over to > real world usage. It would therefore be awesome if one of you could > test this on a larger cluster! > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/db/DbModule.java > e7287cec28e7b8ca978c506bfe821f261bc0ac26 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52669/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > `./gradlew build` > `./gradlew jmh -Pbenchmarks='UpdateStoreBenchmarks.*|TaskStoreBenchmarks.*'` > > > Thanks, > > Stephan Erb > >
