-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/57404/#review168235
-----------------------------------------------------------



Master (932e908) is red with this patch.
  ./build-support/jenkins/build.sh


2: Task failed with an exception.
-----------
* What went wrong:
Execution failed for task ':analyzeReport'.
> Test coverage missing for org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/db/views/DbImage
  Test coverage missing for org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/Mname
  Test coverage missing for org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/Services
  Test coverage missing for org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/QuitCallback
  Test coverage missing for org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/Cron
  Test coverage missing for org/apache/aurora/scheduler/app/VolumeParser
  Test coverage missing for 
org/apache/aurora/scheduler/configuration/executor/ExecutorSettingsLoader$Schema
  Test coverage missing for 
org/apache/aurora/scheduler/configuration/executor/ExecutorSettingsLoader
  Test coverage missing for 
org/apache/aurora/scheduler/pruning/TaskHistoryPruner$1
  Test coverage missing for 
org/apache/aurora/scheduler/stats/AsyncStatsModule$OfferAdapter
  Test coverage missing for 
org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/api/security/IniShiroRealmModule
  Test coverage missing for 
org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/api/security/ShiroUtils
  Test coverage missing for 
org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/api/security/HttpSecurityModule$3
  Test coverage missing for 
org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/api/security/HttpSecurityModule$2
  Test coverage missing for 
org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/api/security/KerberosPrincipalParser
  Test coverage missing for 
org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/api/security/Kerberos5ShiroRealmModule
  Test coverage missing for 
org/apache/aurora/scheduler/http/api/security/Kerberos5ShiroRealmModule$1
  Test coverage missing for 
org/apache/aurora/scheduler/log/mesos/MesosLog$LogStream
  Test coverage missing for org/apache/aurora/scheduler/log/mesos/MesosLog
  Test coverage missing for 
org/apache/aurora/scheduler/log/mesos/MesosLog$LogStream$OpStats
  Test coverage missing for 
org/apache/aurora/scheduler/log/mesos/MesosLog$LogStream$1
  Test coverage missing for 
org/apache/aurora/scheduler/log/mesos/MesosLog$LogStream$LogEntry
  Test coverage missing for 
org/apache/aurora/scheduler/log/mesos/MesosLog$LogStream$LogPosition
  Test coverage missing for 
org/apache/aurora/scheduler/discovery/CommonsServiceDiscoveryModule
  Test coverage missing for 
org/apache/aurora/scheduler/reconciliation/KillRetry$KillAttempt
  Test coverage missing for 
org/apache/aurora/scheduler/preemptor/Preemptor$PreemptorImpl
  Test coverage missing for 
org/apache/aurora/scheduler/storage/db/typehandlers/VolumeModeTypeHandler

* Try:
Run with --stacktrace option to get the stack trace. Run with --info or --debug 
option to get more log output.
==============================================================================

BUILD FAILED

Total time: 14 mins 42.904 secs


I will refresh this build result if you post a review containing "@ReviewBot 
retry"

- Aurora ReviewBot


On March 7, 2017, 6:05 p.m., Zameer Manji wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/57404/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 7, 2017, 6:05 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora and Stephan Erb.
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The `acceptOffers` log message outputs the entire `Operation` object which for
> the `LAUNCH` type includes the entire `TaskInfo` protobuf. This makes the log 
> output
> massive. This reduces the logging to just the type of the operation.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/mesos/VersionedSchedulerDriverService.java
>  9f39aeb1106d5ec29949280b5cf1fe3413e055d4 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/57404/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Zameer Manji
> 
>

Reply via email to