> On June 1, 2017, 9:22 p.m., David McLaughlin wrote:
> > src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/state/StateManagerImpl.java
> > Lines 389-391 (original), 374-376 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/59699/diff/1-2/?file=1736080#file1736080line391>
> >
> >     We probably don't even need the separate events. We could just have:
> >     
> >         eventSink.post(createDeleteEvent(taskStore, taskIds));
> 
> Kai Huang wrote:
>     So this will change the semantics that: The Delete Event is published 
> after we delete task from TaskStore?
> 
> David McLaughlin wrote:
>     I don't think it changes the semantics at all? In both cases, the events 
> are published after the batch delete. All I'm suggesting is we send a single 
> event for the batch rather than one event per task in the batch.

addressed.


- Kai


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/59699/#review176670
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 1, 2017, 10:41 p.m., Kai Huang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/59699/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 1, 2017, 10:41 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, David McLaughlin and Santhosh Kumar.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-1929
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1929
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Improve task history pruning by batch deleting tasks.
> 
> The `'aurora_admin prune_tasks'` endpoint seems to be very slow when the 
> cluster has a large number of inactive tasks.
> 
> This CR batches all removeTasks operations and execute them all at once to 
> avoid additional cost of coalescing. The fix will also benefit implicit task 
> history pruning since it has similar underlying implementation. See 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1929 for more information and 
> details.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/state/StateManagerImpl.java 
> 73878210f9028901fda3b08e66c6a63c24260d35 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59699/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> __unit_tests:__
> 
> ./build-support/jenkins/build.sh
> 
> No unit tests were created for this patch since it does not add new 
> functionalities or alter the interface, but improves the efficiency of the 
> existing code.
> 
> __e2e tests:__
> 
> Attached was a screenshot of the task history pruning benchmark obtained from 
> a scale test in Twitter's test cluster.
> 
> - Before applying this patch, the task history pruning takes ~30 minutes on 
> 130K tasks.
> 
> - After applying the patch, the pruning takes ~1 minute.
> 
> 
> File Attachments
> ----------------
> 
> task_history_pruning_benchmark.png
>   
> https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2017/06/01/74eb5104-d338-4530-abd2-b82fbdc6bf84__task_history_pruning_benchmark.png
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kai Huang
> 
>

Reply via email to