-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30768/#review71589
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


LGTM, just a style consistency nit.  Thanks for fixing this!


src/test/python/apache/aurora/executor/common/test_resource_manager_integration.py
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/30768/#comment117381>

    This source now has 3 styles for continued lines:
    
    - indent matching the first argument
    - +2 indent
    - +4 indent
    
    AFAIK +4 indent is the agreed-upon convention.  Can you fix the whole file 
to match that?


- Bill Farner


On Feb. 8, 2015, 9:34 p.m., Zameer Manji wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/30768/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 8, 2015, 9:34 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Bill Farner and Brian Wickman.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-1115
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1115
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch modifies TaskPath to reject None values.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/python/apache/aurora/executor/thermos_task_runner.py 
> 7b346e253677ee9b42c57782f7f67ff63b6a0083 
>   src/main/python/apache/thermos/common/path.py 
> 9e617051f16f4270b3958f48e0cc43706d245eec 
>   
> src/test/python/apache/aurora/executor/common/test_resource_manager_integration.py
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   src/test/python/apache/thermos/common/test_pathspec.py 
> 3437b196d33d7c2ff6ba292ff99b6881954e7ecb 
>   src/test/sh/org/apache/aurora/e2e/test_end_to_end.sh 
> 989801cfcbd19109ac140b01cd3024d70c78c829 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30768/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> ./pants test src/test/python/apache/thermos::
> ./pants test src/test/python/apache/aurora/executor::
> ./src/test/sh/org/apache/aurora/e2e/test_end_to_end.sh
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Zameer Manji
> 
>

Reply via email to