> On March 9, 2015, 5:50 p.m., Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> > src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/JobUpdateControllerImpl.java,
> >  line 291
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/31814/diff/2/?file=888120#file888120line291>
> >
> >     What's the motivation behind dropping the "Aurora Updater" here?
> 
> Bill Farner wrote:
>     I think the magic user value abuses a field that serves a different 
> purpose.  IMHO an API consumer should be able to programmatically determine 
> that the scheduler independently performed an action without resorting to 
> string matching on the magic value of a field.
>     
>     In this particular case, i don't think the user field adds signal to what 
> is already present in the state enum value.
> 
> Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
>     I still think having a special "Aurora Updater" user clearly visible in 
> the UI makes it way easier to grasp the event origin rather than trying to 
> decipher a particular state meaning. Users may not and should not be familar 
> with the update state diagram in order to understand the cause of the 
> transition. This is especially true in a multi-actor environment where state 
> transitions may come from users (pause/resume/abort), external monitoring 
> service (pause) or the updater itself (pulse expired).
> 
> Bill Farner wrote:
>     > I still think having a special "Aurora Updater" user clearly visible in 
> the UI
>     
>     I completely agree, but the UI should make that decision, not the 
> scheduler.
> 
> Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
>     I see, sure I am fine with that. Do you propose to address it separately? 
> If so, mind filing a ticket?
> 
> Kevin Sweeney wrote:
>     +1 to removal of the magic string - hacking the ui should be done in the 
> ui.

Went with a more broad ticket to cover this: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1178


- Bill


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31814/#review75726
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 7, 2015, 1:06 a.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31814/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 7, 2015, 1:06 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Joshua Cohen and Maxim Khutornenko.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-1077
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1077
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Include messages with internal job updater state transitions.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/InstanceUpdater.java 
> 09f2a74c9e6f6dbf79f83aa7a387587c593b9f0e 
>   
> src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/JobUpdateControllerImpl.java
>  acdade3dca807a221b4da975d0310c91884ee752 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/OneWayJobUpdater.java 
> 27a5b9026f5ac3b3bdeb32813b10435bc3dab173 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/SideEffect.java 
> 27e0654bfb90f48b407edda5a0c914e595d9c552 
>   src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/StateEvaluator.java 
> 66b0e4b7a9b23e3e6c772a21f5adc39e1d1461ad 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/InstanceUpdaterTest.java 
> 4db0080547d61af1511a4fb62bf88b3bbf819f1e 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/JobUpdaterIT.java 
> e24d6bde5f3479a75522e825cce4ec6c30c117aa 
>   src/test/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/updater/OneWayJobUpdaterTest.java 
> 7d0a7438b4a517e5e0d44f4e99aceb1a6d19f987 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31814/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Farner
> 
>

Reply via email to