Alex Behm has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/9017 )

Change subject: IMPALA-6388: Fix the Union node number of hosts estimation
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9017/1/testdata/workloads/functional-planner/queries/PlannerTest/resource-requirements.test
File 
testdata/workloads/functional-planner/queries/PlannerTest/resource-requirements.test:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/9017/1/testdata/workloads/functional-planner/queries/PlannerTest/resource-requirements.test@3563
PS1, Line 3563: select coalesce(int_col, int_col) from functional.alltypes
> That's true. In my view having a coalesce in both queries on different oper
To me it's easier to reason about if the operands are either all passthrough or 
none of them are passthrough because if all operands are consistent they will 
not be reordered. Having a mix of passthrough and non-passthrough means there 
might be reordering.

Also it's not obvious why we have a coalesce() in this test and if we every 
optimize() coalesce this test might "break".



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/9017
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I51e1ecca8dbc84b2b5a72708667b2799d00279f0
Gerrit-Change-Number: 9017
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Taras Bobrovytsky <tbobrovyt...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alex Behm <alex.b...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Taras Bobrovytsky <tbobrovyt...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 21:20:32 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to