Shant Hovsepian has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/16549 )

Change subject: IMPALA-6671: [WIP] Skip locked tables from topic updates
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

(6 comments)

Thanks for working on this Vihang, it will be a life saver.

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16549/1/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/CatalogServiceCatalog.java
File fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/CatalogServiceCatalog.java:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16549/1/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/CatalogServiceCatalog.java@1294
PS1, Line 1294: true
A freeform boolean is hard to read, best to add an inline comment , true /* 
tryLock */ or make it an Enum.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16549/1/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/CatalogServiceCatalog.java@1316
PS1, Line 1316: topicUpdateTblLockMaxWaitTimeMs
I could be misunderstanding the code, but isn't 7200 seconds too long to wait 
before skipping the update?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16549/1/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/CatalogServiceCatalog.java@1325
PS1, Line 1325:           return;
I hope the updateTblPendingVersion() rarely exceeds the number of attempts, but 
if it does throw an exception here, wouldn't it be better to try something else.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16549/1/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/CatalogServiceCatalog.java@1352
PS1, Line 1352:       if (attempt >= 
Table.NUMBER_OF_ATTEMPTS_TO_UPDATE_VERSION) {
              :         throw new CatalogException("Exhausted max number of 
attempts "
              :             + Table.NUMBER_OF_ATTEMPTS_TO_UPDATE_VERSION
              :             + " to update the pending table version");
              :       }
Wouldn't we want to try something more graceful in this case. How would the end 
user recover from this exception.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16549/1/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/HdfsTable.java
File fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/HdfsTable.java:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16549/1/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/HdfsTable.java@2662
PS1, Line 2662: LOG.info(String
              :         .format(
              :             "%s the pending catalog version of table %s from %s 
to %s%s.",
              :             (success ? "Bumped up" : "Attempt to bump up"), 
getFullName(),
              :             expectedPendingVersion,
              :             newCatalogVersion, success ? "" : " failed"));
LOG Debug? Isn't this too frequent.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/16549/1/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/HdfsTable.java@2677
PS1, Line 2677: getAndSet
Why set it to -1? I haven't been able to convince myself that setting it -1 
wouldn't prevent another caller from setting the catalog version to something 
older than intended.



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/16549
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic657b96edbcdc94c6b906e7ca59291f4e4715655
Gerrit-Change-Number: 16549
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Vihang Karajgaonkar <vih...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Impala Public Jenkins <impala-public-jenk...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Shant Hovsepian <sh...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tim Armstrong <tarmstr...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Vihang Karajgaonkar <vih...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 15:31:36 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to