Dan Burkert has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: KUDU-2125: Tablet copy client does not retry on failures
......................................................................


Patch Set 10:

(3 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8016/10/src/kudu/integration-tests/cluster_itest_util.cc
File src/kudu/integration-tests/cluster_itest_util.cc:

PS10, Line 858:  != 
> Neat: I didn't know you could check for equality between a thing and an opt
Yah, it auto derefs it.  Very dangerous if you don't do a check up front, 
though.  I don't think it throws an exception or anything.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/8016/10/src/kudu/tserver/tablet_copy_client.cc
File src/kudu/tserver/tablet_copy_client.cc:

PS10, Line 702: >=
> why >= and not == ?
I thought about it, and mildly preferred >= so that the client doesn't continue 
looping indefinitely if the server sends a block with a too-long length.  I'm 
not sure what would happen in that scenario, but infinite loop doesn't seem 
good.


Line 747:       // Polynomial backoff with 50% jitter.
> Have you used this before? I plotted y=10x^2 and it seems pretty good -- we
I briefly tried to see if we had an abstraction for exponential backoff with 
jitter calculation, and it seems we don't.  This was just gut feeling.  I also 
graphed it initially, for anyone else following along: 
https://www.wolframcloud.com/objects/b532668a-64c0-45d4-8fad-dfce1718cda6


-- 
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/8016
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I7c8454fc600a841bd15306a2b3b06ddf53130be6
Gerrit-PatchSet: 10
Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Dan Burkert <danburk...@apache.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Adar Dembo <a...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin <aser...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Dan Burkert <danburk...@apache.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins
Gerrit-Reviewer: Mike Percy <mpe...@apache.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Todd Lipcon <t...@apache.org>
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to