----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34375/#review84251 -----------------------------------------------------------
This might be a valid namespace alias use case that we hadn't considered, because there is no way to be able to write just `http::Response` otherwise, is there? Seems quite verbose to write process::http everywhere, and on the otherhand just having `Request` or `Response` seems to miss the context of it being http, thoughts? - Ben Mahler On May 18, 2015, 11:13 p.m., Michael Park wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/34375/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated May 18, 2015, 11:13 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos and Till Toenshoff. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > See summary. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/master/master.cpp eaea79df2c693d15087d70b3c9b988e57c894f8e > src/slave/slave.cpp 8e88482f41f37ce7f2559fe793565b66ac46fb35 > src/tests/master_tests.cpp ba3858fb3026f2cc7af0523bd1a0c541eeafc34b > src/tests/slave_tests.cpp acae49731ff17103b529cdf828a63d9d55668549 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34375/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Michael Park > >
