-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34135/#review91401
-----------------------------------------------------------


Bad patch!

Reviews applied: [34908, 34136, 34137]

Failed command: ./support/apply-review.sh -n -r 34137

Error:
 2015-07-12 04:46:07 URL:https://reviews.apache.org/r/34137/diff/raw/ 
[27315/27315] -> "34137.patch" [1]
error: patch failed: include/mesos/slave/isolator.hpp:30
error: include/mesos/slave/isolator.hpp: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: src/Makefile.am:525
error: src/Makefile.am: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp:548
error: src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp: patch does not apply
Failed to apply patch

- Mesos ReviewBot


On July 12, 2015, 4:42 a.m., Ian Downes wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/34135/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 12, 2015, 4:42 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Chi Zhang, Paul Brett, Timothy Chen, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Moved code from Mesos Containerizer to filesystem isolators
>  - filesystem/posix (symlinks, doesn't support container rootfs)
>  - filesystem/linux (bind mounts, does support container rootfs)
> 
> The filesystem/posix isolator will be automatically included if no 
> filesystem/ isolator is specified.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/Makefile.am e5b5d36f0ac160e5a3a9fdc50b31c060a413ce2c 
>   src/slave/containerizer/isolators/filesystem/posix.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/isolators/filesystem/posix.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp 
> 47d146125dfd4ea909e7ec9d94f41cfa11d035e5 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34135/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> existing persistent volumes tests.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ian Downes
> 
>

Reply via email to