-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36620/#review92457
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/linux/cgroups.cpp (line 1504)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/36620/#comment146628>

    This is actually the Freezer right? 
    And we should make this VLOG(1)



src/linux/cgroups.cpp (line 1627)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/36620/#comment146629>

    To me this doesn't killer doesn't "atomically" kill all of them, as that 
implies either all or none.
    
    I think the TaskKiller actually best effort try to kill by signal and 
reintrospect all tasks in a cgroup within the timeout



src/linux/cgroups.cpp (line 1650)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/36620/#comment146630>

    100 ms seems way too fast?
    And why not use the default timeout that's already there?



src/linux/cgroups.cpp (line 1668)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/36620/#comment146632>

    This should go to line 1674?



src/linux/cgroups.cpp (line 1676)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/36620/#comment146631>

    Move to previous line.



src/linux/cgroups.cpp (line 1684)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/36620/#comment146633>

    This fits on to previous line?


- Timothy Chen


On July 21, 2015, 5:18 p.m., Joerg Schad wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/36620/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 21, 2015, 5:18 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Timothy Chen.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3086
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3086
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> WIP Added Non-Freezeer Task Killer.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/linux/cgroups.cpp b7d11ac4eb8b78664c8c7bd7a5b0d566b5bf2f0e 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/36620/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> sudo make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joerg Schad
> 
>

Reply via email to