----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37497/#review96280 -----------------------------------------------------------
Bad patch! Reviews applied: [37196, 37197, 37198, 37200] Failed command: ./support/apply-review.sh -n -r 37200 Error: 2015-08-25 02:27:51 URL:https://reviews.apache.org/r/37200/diff/raw/ [31109/31109] -> "37200.patch" [1] error: patch failed: src/slave/containerizer/provisioners/docker.cpp:160 error: src/slave/containerizer/provisioners/docker.cpp: patch does not apply error: patch failed: src/slave/containerizer/provisioners/docker/store.cpp:264 error: src/slave/containerizer/provisioners/docker/store.cpp: patch does not apply Failed to apply patch - Mesos ReviewBot On Aug. 25, 2015, 1:35 a.m., Lily Chen wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/37497/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 25, 2015, 1:35 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Ian Downes, Jie Yu, Jojy Varghese, Timothy Chen, > and Jiang Yan Xu. > > > Bugs: MESOS-2849 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2849 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Added Docker provisioner paths which handles path manipulation. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/Makefile.am 9fd71d1ddf442712977596e7a13969ff5c1d68db > src/slave/containerizer/provisioners/docker/backend.cpp PRE-CREATION > src/slave/containerizer/provisioners/docker/local_store.cpp PRE-CREATION > src/slave/containerizer/provisioners/docker/paths.hpp PRE-CREATION > src/slave/containerizer/provisioners/docker/paths.cpp PRE-CREATION > src/slave/containerizer/provisioners/docker/reference_store.cpp > PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37497/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > sudo make check > ./bin/mesos-tests.sh --gtest_filter="*DockerProvisioner*" --gtest_repeat=20 > --gtest_shuffle=1 > > > Thanks, > > Lily Chen > >
