> On Sept. 2, 2015, 3:07 a.m., Jiang Yan Xu wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/provisioners/backends/copy.cpp, lines 108-116
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/37921/diff/1-3/?file=1059333#file1059333line108>
> >
> >     Wow, I guess I hadn't realized what you meant by "making sure the 
> > layers have the same basename" and I overlooked the fact that when multiple 
> > layers are applied every layer other than the 1st one is going to have the 
> > rootfs dir already created...
> >     
> >     I think it's too much of a restriction to impose the same basename for 
> > all rootfes and it's not the backend's position to know that they should 
> > all be the same.
> >     
> >     Given that there is unfortunately no standard way of doing this, I 
> > think I'll be OK with either of the following two approaches:
> >     
> >     1) The following two commands can make sure the source overwrites the 
> > target event if it is a diretory.
> >     
> >     GNU cp:
> >     cp -aT source target // -T makes sure the contents are copied.
> >     
> >     OSX cp:
> >     cp a source/ target // The trailing slash makes sure the contents 
> > instead of the directory is copied.
> >     
> >     So we can do something like 
> >     
> >     #ifdef __APPLE__
> >       source += "/"
> >     #else
> >       options += "T"
> >     #endif
> >     
> >     2) Use your previous approach with "/*" expansion but with quotes 
> > around the paths.
> >     
> >     Neither is ideal but is no worse than the system commands we are 
> > already invoking.
> >     
> >     I am OK with either. What do you think?

hmm, I think I'll go for 1) option.


- Timothy


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37921/#review97376
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 1, 2015, 12:58 a.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/37921/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 1, 2015, 12:58 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Jiang Yan Xu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2968
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2968
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add Copy backend for provisioners.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/Makefile.am 7b4d9f65506e7fa8425966009401aae73cdb79a5 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioners/backend.cpp 
> 2f7c335f62fdeb27526ab9a38a07c097422ae92b 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioners/backends/copy.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioners/backends/copy.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/tests/containerizer/provisioner_backend_tests.cpp 
> d321850613223a2357ca1646a9d988d05171772c 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/37921/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Timothy Chen
> 
>

Reply via email to