> On Oct. 15, 2015, 8:28 p.m., Jojy Varghese wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/docker/message.hpp, line 46
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/39353/diff/1/?file=1099046#file1099046line46>
> >
> >     How about handling parse errors ? Maybe change this to a Try?
> 
> Ben Mahler wrote:
>     Agreed, did you see the TODO..?
>     
>     ```
>     // TODO(bmahler): Validate based on docker's validation logic
>     // and return a Try here.
>     ```

Ah my bad.


> On Oct. 15, 2015, 8:28 p.m., Jojy Varghese wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/docker/message.hpp, line 51
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/39353/diff/1/?file=1099046#file1099046line51>
> >
> >     Would this also allow @@ or @@@ ? Wondering if we can use a regular 
> > expression parser for parsing ?
> 
> Ben Mahler wrote:
>     Yes, this won't reject invalid input (given this doesn't return a Try).
>     
>     The first step (this change) is to fix our code to accept valid input 
> (which we weren't doing for all cases!). I've left the TODO for validation 
> and rejecting bad input.

Agreed. What do you think about using a RE parser?


- Jojy


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39353/#review102816
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 15, 2015, 7:17 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39353/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 15, 2015, 7:17 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jojy Varghese and Timothy Chen.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The existing docker image parsing did not work in many cases: if a digest is 
> present, a registry port is included. And it could not resolve the ambiguity 
> that exists between the registry and the repository.
> 
> This follows docker's approach to parsing, which is a bit hacky due to the 
> way the registry and repository are disambiguated, see the comments.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto f2ea4fc62507ce30b7a7981fd6a8c4749eb97190 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/docker/message.hpp 
> 6368bf4caec6f8c3ac97282f41c55381f920bce9 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/docker/message.proto 
> bbac2e6c1f40a7ca3f9227baca56a44cd43f58c6 
>   src/slave/containerizer/provisioner/docker/store.cpp 
> 637c97c0973bda492826803a962c99635647692d 
>   src/tests/containerizer/provisioner_docker_tests.cpp 
> 9c3c45a81be6398722a37911788e347a4e91cce8 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39353/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added a test.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ben Mahler
> 
>

Reply via email to