----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40975/#review112206 -----------------------------------------------------------
3rdparty/libprocess/README.md (lines 536 - 544) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/40975/#comment172546> Hm.. since this document is about programming, do we need to say 'programming notes'? Or is 'notes' enough? It would be nice to also explain why we do this. - Ben Mahler On Dec. 4, 2015, 5:33 p.m., James Peach wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/40975/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Dec. 4, 2015, 5:33 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Document that libprocess ignores SIGPIPE. > > > Diffs > ----- > > 3rdparty/libprocess/README.md c3f309a7dc1c94882c4cc97eeaf0736c2fca0ba5 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40975/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > None. > > > Thanks, > > James Peach > >
