> On Jan. 24, 2016, 3:28 p.m., Joerg Schad wrote: > > include/mesos/mesos.proto, line 482 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/42697/diff/1/?file=1218952#file1218952line482> > > > > We planned to wait for this deprecation cycle, any reason to change > > this right now? > > haosdent huang wrote: > I saw > ``` > // TODO(joerg84): Remove checkpoint field after deprecation cycle starting > - // with 0.27 > ``` > Do you mean we need submit this since 0.28 here?
Afaik we have a six month compatability guarantee (after switching to the monthly releases), i.e. we should wait that period after all code using the flag has been removed (or we release 1.0). Discussed that a bit with adam as we were not really sure we need a deprecation cycle here, but as we decided to have one we should stick to it. - Joerg ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42697/#review116018 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Jan. 24, 2016, 3:26 p.m., haosdent huang wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/42697/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 24, 2016, 3:26 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Adam B and Joerg Schad. > > > Bugs: MESOS-4340 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4340 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Remove checkpointing field from SlaveInfo after deprecation. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/slave-recovery.md acf36b9693972641f38a96e8d6b682e02b6cdbb3 > include/mesos/mesos.proto 96b911fb370223933df52f9370897871827d2247 > src/common/type_utils.cpp 76f48f6a1f5467db032ded8acd296d03353b4172 > src/internal/devolve.cpp 27918f1fc385b1770843697c16a29fd0d376f39d > src/slave/slave.cpp 1f4c8368feb0ce19963577582ce745acfb21aa9f > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42697/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make -j8 check > > > Thanks, > > haosdent huang > >
