> On Feb. 15, 2016, 8:39 p.m., Neil Conway wrote: > > docs/multiple-disk.md, line 12 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/43583/diff/1/?file=1241734#file1241734line12> > > > > "three forms" > > > > Is there a reason to say "currently"? I'd be inclined to remove it as > > redundant.
The reason I used currently is because we will likely introduce a 4th: block devices. Is there a better way to express this? Maybe it's not important to clarify that just yet? - Joris ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43583/#review119238 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Feb. 15, 2016, 7:42 p.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/43583/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 15, 2016, 7:42 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Neil Conway. > > > Bugs: MESOS-4531 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4531 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > See summary. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/multiple-disk.md PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43583/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Joris Van Remoortere > >
