-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43777/#review120834
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Neil Conway


On Feb. 24, 2016, 6:41 p.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/43777/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 24, 2016, 6:41 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Jie Yu, Michael Park, and Neil Conway.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4591
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4591
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Removed unnecessary parameter from validation function.
> 
> Now that Reserve operations are authorized for particular roles, it is 
> unnecessary to pass the framework's role into the validation function for 
> Reserve operations. The function previously ensured that a framework could 
> only reserve resources for its own role, but this check has been removed. 
> Since this check has been removed, the test 
> `ReserveOperationValidationTest.NonMatchingRole` is no longer needed and has 
> also been removed.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/http.cpp 939fab21a2240de7214ef809a194ffb3837a9f1b 
>   src/master/master.cpp 8d6d3c6468c6b85fe09c33cf9747cc3d1f515ab9 
>   src/master/validation.hpp 6ec883e7e84162b648c2f04583cc776948b36c0c 
>   src/master/validation.cpp b0cc7f7ec75b66246686d1b50a61902f1455e8b6 
>   src/tests/master_validation_tests.cpp 
> ab2df22f73052f6bd77653e56e7b460b17e7b0be 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43777/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> This patch removes the test `ReserveOperationValidationTest.NonMatchingRole`, 
> as the condition it was testing for is no longer relevant.
> 
> Ran `configure && make check` and `configure --enable-libevent --enable-ssl 
> && make check` on OSX; all tests passed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Greg Mann
> 
>

Reply via email to