-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43846/#review121054
-----------------------------------------------------------




include/mesos/v1/scheduler.hpp (line 77)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43846/#comment182648>

    I guess you made this protected because it is only used by TestMesos in 
tests? Please add a comment saying as much for posterity.



src/scheduler/scheduler.cpp (line 562)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43846/#comment182646>

    don't do this. see below.



src/scheduler/scheduler.cpp (lines 637 - 638)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43846/#comment182645>

    Yikes. Why are you doing it like this, instead of passing detector as an 
optional argument to the MesosProcess?



src/tests/mesos.hpp (lines 968 - 972)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43846/#comment182647>

    why a new constructor instead of updating the above constructor. you can 
make detector Option<shared_ptr<>> with default None.


- Vinod Kone


On Feb. 22, 2016, 8:24 p.m., Anand Mazumdar wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/43846/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 22, 2016, 8:24 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4686
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4686
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This change adds support for passing in a master detector object to the 
> callback interface. This can be used for testing master failover scenarios 
> similar to how the driver already does it.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/v1/scheduler.hpp 5e462c13ec2715888247eb7b4dc7a2b1d53e6bb1 
>   src/scheduler/scheduler.cpp 99a7d0dfff7b0c61decc9ff6d9e6d46ef13a7e75 
>   src/tests/mesos.hpp 242a11658c0a9ba4caced9b2b2bdbcb921f7fdd0 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43846/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anand Mazumdar
> 
>

Reply via email to