> On 五月 23, 2016, 7:19 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/metadata_manager.hpp, line 
> > 93
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/44838/diff/5/?file=1383502#file1383502line93>
> >
> >     WE don't use 'const' for primitive types. Please use `bool cached` here.

I saw that there are many places using `const bool`, such as 
https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/cgroups/mem.cpp#L75
 , filed a JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5443 for this.


- Guangya


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/44838/#review134420
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 五月 23, 2016, 11:30 p.m., Guangya Liu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/44838/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 五月 23, 2016, 11:30 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gilbert Song, haosdent huang, and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4886
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4886
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Enabled mesos containerizer do not cache image for docker.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/metadata_manager.hpp 
> 137af502a66e6a65773c00eaacbe392576376284 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/metadata_manager.cpp 
> cf630cc0b67a325529fa04ad2b1708e013b9596a 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/store.cpp 
> eeec94326a4fd67675df10e0b6a32267e555fa96 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44838/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make
> make check
> 
> It is difficult to test this with unit test, but just test with mesos execute 
> by setting `force_pull_image` as true and found that the iamge was always 
> pulled when `force_pull_image` is true.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Guangya Liu
> 
>

Reply via email to