> On June 14, 2016, 11:40 a.m., Anand Mazumdar wrote:
> > This is looking much better. 
> > 
> > Can you include both `flags.hpp/flags.cpp` in `src/Makefile.am`? This would 
> > fix the ReviewBot build failures.
> 
> Anand Mazumdar wrote:
>     Hey Jose, I see that you marked the issues as resolved. Did you forget 
> publishing the updated diff? 
>     
>     Also, did you add the new files to the Makefile as per my earlier comment?

I did not update the diff yet because I was running a full build in my local 
machine with the last commits.
I just saw that some unit tests failed, I would like to solve the issues before 
upload the diff.


- Jose Guilherme


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/48387/#review137507
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 13, 2016, 8:20 p.m., Jose Guilherme Vanz wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/48387/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 13, 2016, 8:20 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar, haosdent huang, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-5359
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5359
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The scheduler library has been updated to wait a little deley before
> initiate a connection with the master. The maximum amount of time waited
> by the scheduler is defined by a flag: CONNECTION_DELAY_MAX. After
> the master has been detected the scheduler picks a random delay that
> can be between 0 and the CONNECTION_DELAY_MAX value. MESOS-5359
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/scheduler/constants.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/scheduler/flags.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/scheduler/scheduler.cpp c79837c93e7329dbfa22e4288b44237f33408ba9 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/48387/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jose Guilherme Vanz
> 
>

Reply via email to