> On June 27, 2016, 8:34 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote: > > src/master/http.cpp, line 1261 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/49137/diff/4/?file=1430595#file1430595line1261> > > > > @anand: i remember us discussing about evolving large responses like > > these? was the idea to directly construct a v1 response instead of > > constructiong un-versioned response and evolving it?
+1, yes. Should we be doing it now or do an audit later? I am fine with either of the approaches. - Anand ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49137/#review139643 ----------------------------------------------------------- On June 27, 2016, 7:48 a.m., zhou xing wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/49137/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated June 27, 2016, 7:48 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar, haosdent huang, and Vinod Kone. > > > Bugs: mesos-5492 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/mesos-5492 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Implemented getFrameworks method in http.cpp. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/master/http.cpp d55aa05c76bb2b1fb17b795510fd50c021cdb995 > src/master/master.hpp 648f1a217cc7bbb154a9d7a2a8b2c5d02087af03 > src/tests/api_tests.cpp 7f16f43c3968cd56cf93951489079032093beaeb > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49137/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make > make check > > > Thanks, > > zhou xing > >
