-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51450/#review146942
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





src/tests/containerizer/capabilities_tests.cpp (line 137)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/51450/#comment213831>

    `s/and /and potentially/`



src/tests/containerizer/capabilities_tests.cpp (lines 139 - 145)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/51450/#comment213834>

    I had some difficulty undestanding the issue with this `NOTE`.
    
    How about something like
    
    ~~~~
    Some RedHat-based distributions install `ping` with `NET_RAW` and 
`NET_ADMIN` in both the effective and permitted set in the file capabilities. 
We only require `NET_RAW` for our tests, while `NET_RAW` is needed for setting 
packet marks (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802197). Since these 
capabilities are in the file effective set, the kernel will lift them to the 
effective set, regardless of whether they are needed or not. This issue seems 
to be fixed in later versions 
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142311).
    ~~~~


- Benjamin Bannier


On Aug. 26, 2016, 8 a.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51450/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 26, 2016, 8 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Benjamin Bannier.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Fixed a capabilities test failure on Fedora 23.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/containerizer/capabilities_tests.cpp 
> ec75698cb969d745c82a8358e54e8d8b24f14f7c 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51450/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>

Reply via email to