> On Aug. 31, 2016, 7:07 p.m., Silas Snider wrote:
> > src/health-check/health_checker.cpp, line 183
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/51560/diff/2/?file=1489281#file1489281line183>
> >
> >     This is incorrect. In 1.0.0, you could specify *either* HTTP *or* 
> > Command healthcheck without specifying the type field, but this change will 
> > make the absence of type only support command health checks.
> 
> haosdent huang wrote:
>     Actually we didn't support HTTP/TCP before 1.0.0. So I think should be OK?

Indeed, but it was in the proto for use by schedulers/executors.


- Silas


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51560/#review147468
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 31, 2016, 6:29 p.m., haosdent huang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51560/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 31, 2016, 6:29 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov and Joseph Wu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6110
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6110
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Deprecated using health checks without setting the type.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CHANGELOG eadf546f96e4f8f83107de3e1421197875a46e2b 
>   docs/upgrades.md dc43cad4d9e0bec0f4017ac53d740687c060b332 
>   src/health-check/health_checker.cpp 
> f373df19fc8af8e9650be61e3b101e89362a67cd 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51560/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Could verfied from 
> https://github.com/haosdent/mesos/blob/85abb6da058bf8daf4e794df7da8eb5f240b671c/docs/upgrades.md
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> haosdent huang
> 
>

Reply via email to