> On Oct. 31, 2016, 2:20 p.m., Joseph Wu wrote:
> > src/local/local.cpp, lines 214-228
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/53313/diff/1/?file=1549317#file1549317line214>
> >
> >     If you move `#ifdef` up one, you won't need to add the extra `EXIT(..)`.
> 
> Alex Clemmer wrote:
>     I personally would rather have an exit message that specifically tells 
> the user about their invalid configuration. Do you think that this is a bad 
> idea?

You'd fall through to this error message:
```
"'" << masterFlags.registry << "' is not a supported option for registry 
persistence";
```

I'd say this message is pretty much the same as the message you've added.  The 
`on Windows` part should hopefully be pretty obvious to the user :)


- Joseph


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/53313/#review154320
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 7, 2016, 10:23 a.m., Alex Clemmer wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/53313/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 7, 2016, 10:23 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Daniel Pravat and Joseph Wu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Many agent tests currently use the master in some form. Of those,
> relatively few use the leveldb-based persistence. Since we cannot
> currently compile leveldb on Windows, and since running these tests on
> Windows involves compiling and running the master, this commit will
> remove the direct dependency on the replicated log for windows builds of
> the master.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/local/local.cpp 257179443827ffdfc946ed655a6840fcea70d454 
>   src/master/main.cpp 2d2dfb7d632f3c7be1796efd8f0a1f4d18760261 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53313/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alex Clemmer
> 
>

Reply via email to