-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/54062/#review156920
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/master/validation.hpp (lines 60 - 61)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/54062/#comment227287>

    new line here as `//`



src/master/validation.hpp (line 61)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/54062/#comment227283>

    ```
    --- MULTI_ROLE is NOT set ---
    ```



src/master/validation.hpp (line 69)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/54062/#comment227284>

    Add `//` here



src/master/validation.hpp (line 70)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/54062/#comment227285>

    ```
    --- MULTI_ROLE is set ---
    ```



src/master/validation.hpp (lines 77 - 78)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/54062/#comment227286>

    new line here as `//`



src/master/validation.cpp (line 249)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/54062/#comment227288>

    s/FrameworkInfo.role/'FrameworkInfo.role' 
    s/FrameworkInfo.roles/'FrameworkInfo.roles'
    
    Ditto for other error messages.



src/master/validation.cpp (lines 264 - 265)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/54062/#comment227289>

    How about 
    
    ```
    return Error("The MULTI_ROLE framework capability must be enabled"
                 " when 'FrameworkInfo.roles' is set");
    ```



src/master/validation.cpp (lines 295 - 305)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/54062/#comment227290>

    How about the following?
    
    ```
    // TODO(jay_guo) Consider extending this method to validate more
    // fields of FrameworkInfo in the future.
    Option<Error> validate(const mesos::FrameworkInfo& frameworkInfo)
    {
      vector<lambda::function<Option<Error>()>> validators = {
        lambda::bind(internal::validateRoles, frameworkInfo)
      };
    
      foreach (const lambda::function<Option<Error>()>& validator, validators) {
        Option<Error> error = validator();
        if (error.isSome()) {
          return error;
        }
      }
    
      return None();
    }
    ```



src/master/validation.cpp (line 301)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/54062/#comment227291>

    I think we do not need to mention `Invalid roles` here as here we are 
checking both `role` and `roles`, using the error returned by 
`internal::validateRoles` is good enough.



src/tests/master_validation_tests.cpp (lines 2333 - 2335)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/54062/#comment227300>

    ```
    // This tests the validate roles function of FrameworkInfo. For 3
    // attributes including role, roles and MULTI_ROLE capability,
    // we have 2^3 cases to test in total.
    ```



src/tests/master_validation_tests.cpp (line 2390)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/54062/#comment227295>

    keep align with `FrameworkValidationTest`



src/tests/master_validation_tests.cpp (line 2415)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/54062/#comment227296>

    ```
    // This test ensures subscription succeeds for multiple role 
    // framework when MULTI_ROLE capability is enabled.
    ```



src/tests/master_validation_tests.cpp (line 2423)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/54062/#comment227297>

    <p></p>
    <div class="codehilite"><pre>// Add multiple roles to the FrameworkInfo 
with MULTI_ROLE
    // capability is enabled.
    </pre></div>



src/tests/master_validation_tests.cpp (line 2454)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/54062/#comment227298>

    ```
    // Add multiple roles to the FrameworkInfo with MULTI_ROLE
    // capability is enabled.
    ```


- Guangya Liu


On 十一月 25, 2016, 11:26 a.m., Jay Guo wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/54062/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 十一月 25, 2016, 11:26 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler, Guangya Liu, and Qiang Zhang.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6629
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6629
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> We need to do necessary validation for the conflicts of role, roles
> and MULTI_ROLE capability. It complies with following matrix:
> 
> -- MULTI_ROLE is NOT set -
>         |-------|---------|
>         |Roles  |No Roles |
> |-------|-------|---------|
> |Role   | Error |  None   |
> |-------|-------|---------|
> |No Role| Error |  None   |
> |-------|-------|---------|
> 
> --- MULTI_ROLE is set ----
>         |-------|---------|
>         |Roles  |No Roles |
> |-------|-------|---------|
> |Role   | Error |  Error  |
> |-------|-------|---------|
> |No Role| None  |  None   |
> |-------|-------|---------|
> 
> One test case is added to ensure validateRoles() catches invalid
> combination of these attributes. Another three test cases are added
> to ensure the master accepts/rejects subscription given valid/invalid
> multiple roles.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.cpp e03a2e8025943825a2902102c43dc0eb66bacb6a 
>   src/master/validation.hpp b8389460f34b3531f2b6ff93f18f496c01e1a079 
>   src/master/validation.cpp 42d9b4a8784c2a161b74d7b46619cc22272e14e3 
>   src/tests/master_validation_tests.cpp 
> f893067859425967654401f3226149268b51cf57 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/54062/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jay Guo
> 
>

Reply via email to