> On Nov. 29, 2016, 3:08 p.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> > I'd still like to see more discussion of how someone might actually use 
> > this feature. For example, when you say "With these constraints operators 
> > can use a
> > global hard limit to contain resource limits set by users" -- how would the 
> > operator do this? Presumably the operator cannot enforce global resource 
> > limits via a user-specified flag in `ContainerInfo`.
> 
> Benjamin Bannier wrote:
>     This section is related to POSIX resource limits in particular, and not 
> how they are mapped in Mesos. I specifically mention _POSIX resource limit_ 
> at the beginning of the paragraph, and also replaced _operator_ with _system 
> administrators_ to make this clearer.

Sure. I still think that there should be more discussion of how to use this 
feature to solve an actual problem that a cluster operator or user might 
encounter.


- Neil


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/53982/#review157254
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 5, 2016, 10:14 a.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/53982/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 5, 2016, 10:14 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Neil Conway.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6427
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6427
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added documentation for posix/rlimit isolator.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/mesos-containerizer.md 2bff35f6361f760a9001a249d2c01bbbc9e72932 
>   docs/posix_rlimits.md PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53982/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested with github markdown renderer, and with build setup from `site/`.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Bannier
> 
>

Reply via email to