-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/54408/#review158316
-----------------------------------------------------------



Patch looks great!

Reviews applied: [53885, 53886, 53887, 53888, 53889, 53890, 53891, 53892, 
53893, 53894, 53895, 53896, 53897, 54467, 54468, 54380, 54387, 54177, 54178, 
54179, 54180, 54181, 54182, 54183, 54232, 54312, 54407, 54408]

Passed command: export OS='ubuntu:14.04' BUILDTOOL='autotools' COMPILER='gcc' 
CONFIGURATION='--verbose' ENVIRONMENT='GLOG_v=1 MESOS_VERBOSE=1'; 
./support/docker_build.sh

- Mesos ReviewBot


On Dec. 7, 2016, 4:20 a.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/54408/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 7, 2016, 4:20 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6719
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6719
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> That is, the master previously tracked two separate things about a
> framework: its "state" (CONNECTED, DISCONNECTED, or RECOVERED), and
> whether the framework is considered active. It is simpler to represent
> the latter value as just another state: a framework can now be ACTIVE,
> INACTIVE, DISCONNECTED, or RECOVERED. A framework is "connected" if it
> is either ACTIVE or INACTIVE. This rules out a few combinations that
> never made sense, such as "state = DISCONNECTED and active = TRUE".
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/http.cpp ac560d1fdd219d0de0c5d987a32a7112e149602f 
>   src/master/master.hpp b444b2352360fb4f7179acd97dffc0cd81cc7afa 
>   src/master/master.cpp b0670d993348d189fafff0f83f9da0c5b18d1c51 
>   src/master/quota_handler.cpp 5578663f26d9b737499dc4f5a286c34c37645442 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/54408/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check`
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Neil Conway
> 
>

Reply via email to