-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/54999/#review160046
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





src/tests/fault_tolerance_tests.cpp (line 890)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/54999/#comment231056>

    Let's drop `Even with a paused clock,` since at this point the clock is 
actually resumed.



src/tests/master_tests.cpp (line 5816)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/54999/#comment231055>

    Let's drop `Even with a paused clock,` since at this point the clock is 
actually resumed.


- Benjamin Bannier


On Dec. 22, 2016, 11:54 p.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/54999/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 22, 2016, 11:54 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov and Benjamin Bannier.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6837
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6837
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> `FaultToleranceTest.FrameworkReregister` and
> `MasterTest.FailoverAgentReregisterFirst` both examined a timestamp
> value returned by an HTTP endpoint. Such values are the result of
> several conversions (`double` to `string` to `JSON::Value`); this might
> result in the returned value being an integer one larger/smaller than we
> expect. Hence, make the comparison within an epsilon of 1.
> 
> A similar issue in `SlaveTest.StateEndpoint` was fixed in
> 595c929f2816b713b4c36ce1bd23a7767afe8135.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/fault_tolerance_tests.cpp 
> 24747fab20f5b107b9c23a271b753e83f05bbee3 
>   src/tests/master_tests.cpp 2d0cd8244ded44e76f0eee3d87327ff526db5208 
>   src/tests/slave_tests.cpp 67a6aed8c66a21c94c106b52dff75cbdc41fcf69 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/54999/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check`
> 
> Note that I wasn't able to repro the test failure on my laptop, but it was 
> observed on CI.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Neil Conway
> 
>

Reply via email to