> On Jan. 24, 2017, 9:37 p.m., Joseph Wu wrote: > > src/health-check/tcp_connect.cpp, lines 33-38 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/55549/diff/1/?file=1605582#file1605582line33> > > > > Libprocess headers should go above stout headers.
Oh, did this change recently, or have I just always done this wrong? > On Jan. 24, 2017, 9:37 p.m., Joseph Wu wrote: > > src/health-check/tcp_connect.cpp, lines 148-150 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/55549/diff/1/?file=1605582#file1605582line148> > > > > Should there be a `process::finalize` here? Actually, now that I think about it, this should not take a dependency on libprocess at all. Let's use the Stout WSA functions instead. - Alex ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/55549/#review162853 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Jan. 15, 2017, 9:35 p.m., Alex Clemmer wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/55549/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 15, 2017, 9:35 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Andrew Schwartzmeyer, Daniel Pravat, and Joseph Wu. > > > Bugs: MESOS-6709 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6709 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > This is a blocker for MESOS-6709, which requires both the health checker > and the TCP connector to build and work on Windows. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/health-check/CMakeLists.txt ce195e2820c70dd7ebec1f06a6382f58fc729af7 > src/health-check/health_checker.cpp > a8424b75927d15dc1b897faf0e47cf075c70ff26 > src/health-check/tcp_connect.cpp ad1e932da53c8f6b0ae77dfa6b6bb3d642273af9 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/55549/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Alex Clemmer > >
