> On Feb. 21, 2017, 3:20 p.m., Zhitao Li wrote: > > docs/upgrades.md, lines 252-260 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/56867/diff/1/?file=1640650#file1640650line252> > > > > 1. Is the order of these actions matter? I recall we specifically say > > order of upgrading each component does not mater, so I'm interested in why > > this is being explicitly called out; > > 2. Is this specific to 1.1.x -> 1.2.x upgrade, or serves just a general > > guideline regardless of versions? (if former, maybe call out the reason; if > > latter, maybe move to a different location).
1. We generally recommend upgrading masters before agents (and rebuilding modules before either). 2. This is nothing new to 1.2.x, and is actually included in each release's section (except 1.1.x). The order/recommendation doesn't usually change much, although it has evolved as we have added modules and clarified the need for scheduler/executor upgrades. - Adam ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56867/#review166262 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Feb. 20, 2017, 11:57 p.m., Adam B wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/56867/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 20, 2017, 11:57 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Added upgrade guide for 1.2.x. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/upgrades.md 74f4367020d7025bdcfbbf50a166a644ee5050bc > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56867/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Adam B > >
